Evaluating forward osmosis performance of MEA/MDEA absorbents for water replenishment in post-combustion carbon capture

Xiangyun Liao,Chengdong Kong,Jian Liu,Yi Xu,Yanchi Jiang,Xiaojiang Wu,Zhongxiao Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2024.127984
IF: 8.6
2024-05-22
Separation and Purification Technology
Abstract:The large-scale deployment of post-combustion carbon capture exerted additional pressure on water resources. In this work, the feasibility of forward osmosis driven by unloaded or CO 2 loaded Monoethanolamine (MEA), N-Methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) and their blended absorbents for water replenishment was investigated. The results indicated that the water flux of unloaded MDEA solution increased from 12.92 LMH to 18.72 LMH at amine concentrations from 1 M to 5 M, which was much higher than that of unloaded MEA solution, owing to the huge differences of the osmotic pressure. As the MEA and the MDEA were blended, some synergistic effects may work to result in the higher osmotic pressures and the lower water fluxes of MEA-MDEA blended solutions than the summation of the individual ones, respectively. Furthermore, as the CO 2 was absorbed by the MEA-MDEA blended solution, the water fluxes of the CO 2 loaded solutions increased nonlinearly. Specifically, when the CO 2 loading was lower than a specific critical value, the growth of the water fluxes of MEA-MDEA blended solutions with the CO 2 loading gradually slowed down, caused by the increase of the solute diffusion resistivity. However, when the CO 2 loading exceeded the critical value, the water fluxes of blended solutions become increasing faster with the CO 2 loading, probably due to the increase of the concentration of HCO 3 – and MEAH + . On the other hand, there was an optimal CO 2 loading value that minimized the reverse solute flux.
engineering, chemical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?