Randomized split‐mouth clinical trial comparing osteoblastic activity and osteogenic potential of autogenous particle harvesting during implant surgery without irrigation and with irrigation

Fabio Camacho‐Alonso,Ana María Mercado‐Díaz,Rebeca Rivas‐Ballester,Juan Carlos Bernabeu‐Mira,David Peñarrocha‐Oltra,María del Rosario Tudela‐Mulero
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13355
2024-06-25
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
Abstract:Objective To compare the osteoblastic activity and osteogenic potential of autogenous particle harvesting during implant surgery using low‐speed drilling without irrigation and high‐speed drilling with irrigation. Materials and Methods Thirty patients with bilateral missing teeth of 3.6 and 4.6 were randomized into two groups (Group 1: low‐speed drilling without irrigation and Group 2: high‐speed drilling with irrigation) and 60 single dental implants were placed. The temperature at the tip of each drill was recorded and the harvested bone was weighed; particle size and Ca and P levels were also analyzed. After osteoblast culture, cell viability, cell cycle assay, cell migration, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) concentration, and mineralized nodule formation were assessed. Results Although the temperature of the drills was slightly higher in Group 1, no statistically significant differences were observed (p ≤ 0.05); however, the amount of harvested bone was higher (p
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?