Clinical Investigation and Patient Satisfaction of Short Implants Versus Longer Implants with Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation in Atrophic Posterior Maxillae: A Pilot Randomized Trial

Xiao-Meng Zhang,Jun-Yu Shi,Ying-Xin Gu,Shi-Chong Qiao,Jia-Ji Mo,Hong-Chang Lai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12435
2016-01-01
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
Abstract:PurposeThe aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical parameters and patient satisfaction of the treatments with short implants compared to longer implants with osteotome sinus floor elevation (OSFE) in atrophic posterior maxillae.Materials and MethodThe patient data were retrieved from an ongoing randomized controlled trial (NCT02350075). Patients were randomly allocated into three groups: (group1: short-6mm implant, group 2: short-8-mm implant with OSFE, group 3: standard-10mm implant with OSFE). Early implant failure, complications, implant stability quotient (ISQ) and patient satisfaction by means of visual analogue scale (VAS) were evaluated. ANOVA analysis was performed for the data comparison.ResultsFifty-six patients were enrolled in the present study. No implant loss was found by the end of the restoration placement. No significant difference of ISQ values was found among three groups at the time of implant surgery and impression taking (p=.67 and.54, respectively). VAS values regarding intraoperative vibratory sense in group 1 were significantly higher than those in group 3 (p=.01).ConclusionAll three treatments were safe in atrophic posterior maxilla (6mmresidual bone height<8mm). Patients were satisfied with all three treatments, while the malleting during the osteotome procedure could make patients feel uncomfortable.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?