Abstract:Introduction Bidirectional vertical ridge augmentation in the posterior maxilla is very challenging. Purpose To evaluate the regenerative potential of micrografts, derived from periosteum or bone tissue, added to an anorganic xenograft in vertical reconstruction of the posterior maxilla, by a prospective, controlled study. Materials and methods After clinical selection and the analysis of CBCT scans, 24 posterior maxillary sites, in 19 patients, were treated by using Barbell Technique®. Sites requiring both inlay and onlay reconstruction were enrolled in the study. In the Control Group (CG, n = 8), a xenograft was used in the inlay site and for the onlay site, a 1:1 mix of xenograft and an autograft was used. In Test Group 1 (TG1, n = 8), both inlay and onlay sites were grafted with the xenograft associated with the micrografts derived from periosteum. In Test Group 2 (TG2, n = 8), both inlay and onlay sites were grafted with the xenograft associated with the micrografts derived from bone. Six months after the procedures, CBCT scans were obtained, and bone biopsy samples were harvested during implant placement surgery. The bone specimens were analyzed histomorphometrically, by measuring the percentages of vital mineralized tissue (VMT), non vital mineralized tissue (NVMT) and non mineralized tissue (NMT). Immunohistochemically, the levels of VEGF were categorized by a score approach. Results Histomorphometric analysis revealed, for the inlay grafts, no significant difference among the groups for VMT, NVMT and NMT. However, for onlay grafts, CG achieved a higher amount of VMT in comparison with TG2, and the opposite occurred for NMT values. In this regard, no statistical difference was observed between CG and TG1. Concerning immunohistochemistry, the VEGF values for CG and TG1 were slightly higher than those obtained by TG2 for both inlay and onlay grafts, but without statistical significance. CBCT analysis showed a similar level of gain for all groups, for both inlay and onlay bone augmentation sites. Clinically, one implant (in CG) within a total of 50 implants installed, had early failure and was replaced after 3 months. All patients received implant supported prosthesis. Conclusion This study indicated that the clinical use of micrograft derived from periosteum may have some potential to increase bone formation in onlay reconstructions, unlike the micrograft derived from bone tissue.

Comparative analysis of two biomaterials mixed with autogenous bone graft for vertical ridge augmentation: A histomorphometric study in humans

Autogenous Dentin Particulate Graft for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation with and without Use of Collagen Membrane: Preliminary Histological Analysis on Humans

Use of autologous micrografts associated with xenogeneic anorganic bone in vertical bone augmentation procedures with Barbell Technique®

Vitality of autologous retromolar bone grafts for alveolar ridge augmentation after a 3‐months healing period: A prospective histomorphometrical analysis

Histological Evaluation of Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Different Bone Grafts: Clinical Study Analysis Part II

Meta-analysis of Application of Autogenous Dentin for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation

Vertical Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Using Autogenous Bone Grafts and Platelet-Enriched Fibrin Glue with Simultaneous Implant Placement

The Influence of Residual Alveolar Bone Height on Graft Composition after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Two Different Xenografts: A Histomorphometric Comparative Study

Assessment of vertical ridge augmentation and marginal bone loss using autogenous onlay vs inlay grafting techniques with simultaneous implant placement in the anterior maxillary esthetic zone: A randomized clinical trial

Clinical and Micro-CT analyses of Vertical Guided Bone Regeneration of Mandible using a d-PTFE Membrane, Autogenous Bone, and High-Temperature Processed Xenograft- A Case Series Study

Horizontal ridge augmentation with a resorbable membrane and particulated autogenous bone with or without anorganic bovine bone-derived mineral: a prospective case series in 22 patients

Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction with Titanium Mesh and a Mixture of Autogenous Bone Graft and Algipore

Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using a Collagenated Xenograft: A Randomized Clinical Trial

The Assessment of Volumetric Changes for Alveolar Ridge Preservation or Reconstruction by Three-dimensional Analysis at Posterior Extraction Sites with Severe Bone Defects Using DBBM-C Collagen Membrane and PRF: A Prospective and Randomized Clinical Trial

Histomorphometric evaluation of human extraction sockets treated with autologous fibrin, sticky bone or biphasic calcium phosphate

Alveolar ridge preservation with fibroblast growth factor-2 modified acellular dermal matrix membrane and a bovine-derived xenograft: An experimental in vivo study

Half‐ and full‐grafting alveolar ridge preservation with different sealing materials: A three‐arm randomized clinical trial

Vertical Alveolar Ridge Augmentation with Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate and Autologous Osteoblasts in Canine Mandible

Three-dimensional analysis of bone remodeling following ridge augmentation of compromised extraction sockets in periodontitis patients: A randomized controlled study

Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Augmentation with Allogeneic Bone Block Graft Compared with Autogenous Bone Block Graft: a Systematic Review

Comparative Assessment of Bovine Versus Porcine Xenograft for Augmentation: A Randomized Prospective Cohort Study