Abstract:The article considers the personal interest of Marx and the Marxist tradition in changing the world. As a rule, and this can be explained by political reasons, Marx and Engels are credited with an identical position on this issue. The author shows that this is a simplification and offers his interpretation based on the primacy of philosophical origins for the development of Marx's ideas. In this case, Marx turns out to be a Hegelian and a critic of Aristotle, while Engels remains an anti-Hegelian. Engels follows Schelling in denying Hegel, and Marx builds his concept on the basis of Hegel's theory of the modern world, while simultaneously challenging the Aristotelian concept of economic value. Engels denies contemporary philosophy, giving priority to science and so-called scientific socialism. Marxist economics, on the other hand, arises as a reaction of Marx to Aristotelian intuitions. The author shows that Marx's philosophy and the Marxist tradition should be distinguished not only because of the various embodiments of the latter, but primarily because of their different philosophical origins. This differentiation of the ideas of Marx himself and the Marxism growing out of Engel's interpretation can be carried out based on the formulation of the question of the relationship of being and thinking in cognition proposed by Parmenides. For Engels, questions of epistemology boil down to the fact that thinking about being and being itself should coincide. Later, this materialistic approach will form the basis of reflection theory. Marx's position is more complicated and can be characterized as idealistic. It is this fundamental discrepancy that determines the difference between the attitude of Marx and the Marxist tradition to the question of the longing to change the world.

A Brief Analysis On the Engels's Revisions of "The Outline of Feuerbach"

Enlightenment Reason and Modernity: Marx’s Critical Reconstruction

Engels's Concern for the Times and His Theoretical Innovation:A Study on Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy

The Historical and Original State of Marx's Philosophical Revolution's Key Process

Critical Detachment—An Interpretation of the Relationship of Marx and Feuerbach

On Engels' Logic of Criticism in “On Feuerbach”

Three Modes of Interpreting Marxism——Chinese Theorists' Studies on Manuscript of Economics and Philosophy in 1844 and Our New Viewpoints

Engels's Great Contributions and Historical Status——Must Answer to the Ideological Challenge of Conflicts between Marx and Engels

On the Eve of a Turn for Materialism and Communism:Rethinking the Thought Development of Marx in the Period of Rheinische Zeitung

The Question of Marx-Engels in Colletti's Vision

On the Revision of Marxism of Jean Jaurès,the Famous Leader of the Second International

Research on Engels in Studies of Marxism in the West: A Critical Evaluation

Reflection Upon the Way to Understand Marxist Philosophy——Inferences from on the Two Facts of Relationships Between Marx and Feuerbach

Rethinking of the Relation of Aesthetics and Literary Thought between Marx and Engels

Explanation and Misinterpretation --Evaluating Elaboration on Marxist Philosophy Offered by Theorists from the Second International

Remarks on Marx and Changing the World

MEGA~② II and "Engels'editing problem of Capital"

Kreuznach Notebooks and Tripartite-Social-Formation-Theory

The Position of Mill Notes by Karl Marx in the History of Thoughts

Was there A "Feuerbach Stage" in Marx’s Philosophy?——Question of "Two Transformations of Marx’s Philosophy"

On the Alleged Differences between Marx and Engels