Abstract:The article considers the personal interest of Marx and the Marxist tradition in changing the world. As a rule, and this can be explained by political reasons, Marx and Engels are credited with an identical position on this issue. The author shows that this is a simplification and offers his interpretation based on the primacy of philosophical origins for the development of Marx's ideas. In this case, Marx turns out to be a Hegelian and a critic of Aristotle, while Engels remains an anti-Hegelian. Engels follows Schelling in denying Hegel, and Marx builds his concept on the basis of Hegel's theory of the modern world, while simultaneously challenging the Aristotelian concept of economic value. Engels denies contemporary philosophy, giving priority to science and so-called scientific socialism. Marxist economics, on the other hand, arises as a reaction of Marx to Aristotelian intuitions. The author shows that Marx's philosophy and the Marxist tradition should be distinguished not only because of the various embodiments of the latter, but primarily because of their different philosophical origins. This differentiation of the ideas of Marx himself and the Marxism growing out of Engel's interpretation can be carried out based on the formulation of the question of the relationship of being and thinking in cognition proposed by Parmenides. For Engels, questions of epistemology boil down to the fact that thinking about being and being itself should coincide. Later, this materialistic approach will form the basis of reflection theory. Marx's position is more complicated and can be characterized as idealistic. It is this fundamental discrepancy that determines the difference between the attitude of Marx and the Marxist tradition to the question of the longing to change the world.

The Position of Mill Notes by Karl Marx in the History of Thoughts

Enlightenment Reason and Modernity: Marx’s Critical Reconstruction

The Exact Content and the Theoretical Status of "Alienation of Communication" in <Mill Notes> of Karl Marx

The Turning Point of Marx’s Thoughts:the Theory of the Alienation of Commerce in Glossen zu James Mill

On Karl Marx's Early Economic Study from the Perspective of Doctrinal History

The Turning Point in Marx's Monetary Theory and its Relation to his Political Positions

Re-Consideration of the Position and Role of Alienation Theory in Marx's Philosophy

Marx's Achievements in His Criticism of Proudhon——an Analysis on the Significance of The Poverty of Theory

Remarks on Marx and Changing the World

The Connotation-evolution of K Marx's Relations of Production Concept and Its Philosophical Significances

The Change of the View of Private Property: The Theoretical Opportunity of Marx's Transcendence of Philosophical Communism

Is Marx's Theory of Alienated Labor in Paris Manuscript Circular Reasoning

Kreuznach Notebooks and Tripartite-Social-Formation-Theory

"On Capital" and the Microscopic Foundation of Historical Materialism:Taking Marx's Productivity Theory as Example

The Philosophical Method of Marx's Economic Assumptions as Exemplified in the Relationship between Two Definitions of "Socially Necessary Labor Time"

The Historical Guidepost of Marx's Economic Thought:Reading Marx's Economic Manuscripts of 1861-1863

On Philosophical Content of Karl Marx's Concept of “Material Production”

The Correct Evaluation of the Position of Critique of Hegel' S Philosophy of Right in the History of Thoughts

Marx and Engels' Critique of Young Hegelianism and Its Significance

Exploring Marx’s Labor Theory of Value from the Experience of Common Sense Chinese Full Text

Interpretation of Marx's wage Theory