Abstract:The article considers the personal interest of Marx and the Marxist tradition in changing the world. As a rule, and this can be explained by political reasons, Marx and Engels are credited with an identical position on this issue. The author shows that this is a simplification and offers his interpretation based on the primacy of philosophical origins for the development of Marx's ideas. In this case, Marx turns out to be a Hegelian and a critic of Aristotle, while Engels remains an anti-Hegelian. Engels follows Schelling in denying Hegel, and Marx builds his concept on the basis of Hegel's theory of the modern world, while simultaneously challenging the Aristotelian concept of economic value. Engels denies contemporary philosophy, giving priority to science and so-called scientific socialism. Marxist economics, on the other hand, arises as a reaction of Marx to Aristotelian intuitions. The author shows that Marx's philosophy and the Marxist tradition should be distinguished not only because of the various embodiments of the latter, but primarily because of their different philosophical origins. This differentiation of the ideas of Marx himself and the Marxism growing out of Engel's interpretation can be carried out based on the formulation of the question of the relationship of being and thinking in cognition proposed by Parmenides. For Engels, questions of epistemology boil down to the fact that thinking about being and being itself should coincide. Later, this materialistic approach will form the basis of reflection theory. Marx's position is more complicated and can be characterized as idealistic. It is this fundamental discrepancy that determines the difference between the attitude of Marx and the Marxist tradition to the question of the longing to change the world.

On the Eve of a Turn for Materialism and Communism:Rethinking the Thought Development of Marx in the Period of Rheinische Zeitung

Enlightenment Reason and Modernity: Marx’s Critical Reconstruction

Why Marx Stay at the Radical Democracy:Reproducing Marx's Political Philosophy during German-French Yearbook Times

Marx's Initial Focus and Early Exploration on the Material Interests: Discrimination of Academia Three Questions

Shift in Marx and Engels’ historical materialism perspective

On Marx's Transcendence over Philosophical Materialism and the Revolutionary Significance of His New Materialism——A Review of "Marx's Natural Concept" by Schimitt

Two Faces of the Connection between Marx and Christianity——From Loewith's Inquisition of the Premise of Theology of Modern Enlightenment Historical View

Engels's Concern for the Times and His Theoretical Innovation:A Study on Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy

Marx and Engels' Critique of Young Hegelianism and Its Significance

The Formation of the Practical Viewpoint and Practical Aesthetics of Marxism

Historical Materialism as a Philosophical Theory and As a Theory of Social History

The Change of the View of Private Property: The Theoretical Opportunity of Marx's Transcendence of Philosophical Communism

A preliminary study of the relational-generative theory from the perspective of practical materialism:Note III of Rereading Marx's Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844

A Discussion about the Ontological Foundation of Marx's Practical Materialism——As a Reply to Mr. Dong Xuewen

Practice and Material Production——On the Essence of Marxist New World Outlook

The Turning Point of Marx’s Thoughts:the Theory of the Alienation of Commerce in Glossen zu James Mill

On Marx-Hess Academic Relationship from the Perspective of Feuerbach Chinese Full Text

Historical Conception of Materialism and Enlightenment:A Re-analysis

On Marx's Consideration of the Fate of Russion Rural Communities and the Maturation of Historic Materialism

Remarks on Marx and Changing the World

Marx, Hegel and ‘Contradiction’