Academia or Industry: Lessons on Choosing Career Paths─There May Be More Than One Fork in the Road Ahead

Donna G Blackmond,Marion Emmert,Donna M Huryn,Michael L Neidig,Thomas Schaub,Joseph J Topczewski,Karla Bravo-Altamirano,Zachary Buchan,Pablo J Cabrera

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.4c01099

IF: 5.2

2024-04-13

Organic Letters

Abstract:Org Lett . 2024 Apr 12;26(14):2682-2685. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.4c01099. NO

chemistry, organic

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Career Pathways, Part 10

Christiane D. Wrann,Jin Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-022-00666-x

IF: 19.865

2022-01-01

Nature Metabolism

Abstract:In our tenth instalment of Career pathways, Jin Zhang and Christiane Wrann reflect on their journeys to becoming PIs and the importance of having a vision for your research, finding the right team, and sharing the joy of science through the training of students.
Choices for Ph.D.s in Engineering: Analyses of Career Paths in Academia and Industry

Monica Farmer Cox,Jiabin Zhu,Benjamin Ahn,Jeremi S. London,Shree Frazier,Ana T. Torres-Ayala,Rocio Chavela Guerra

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--17605

2020-01-01

Abstract:Our study presents the career trajectories of engineering Ph.D.s from the perspectives of both industry and academia. In this report, we identified approximately 34 engineering Ph. D. graduates from U.S. programs who: (1) worked only in academia; (2) worked only in industry; (3) worked in academia first and now work in industry; or (4) worked in industry first and now work on academia. Using curricula vitae (CVs) as a main data source, we mapped out the detailed career trajectories of each participant. The comparisons within and across different groups characterized the particular career developmental models for each group. Both academia-only and industry-only groups demonstrate a relative linear developmental career path. However, it is notable that participants in the academia-only group tend to hold multiple appointments when compared to their industry-only peers. Participants from groups (3) and (4) showed much more complex career patterns than the first two groups. Also, all of our participants in the last two groups hold leadership positions currently. This observation emphasized the importance of leadership skills training for engineering Ph. D. s. Overall, this reports summarized pilot findings on career trajectories of engineering Ph.D.s. It provides unique insights for both the career planning of recent engineering Ph.D. graduates and the training and preparation of current engineering Ph.D.s.
Choose Your Own Adventure: Developing A Values-Oriented Framework for Your Career

Lucianne M. Walkowicz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1805.09963

2018-05-25

Abstract:We've all heard how academia evaluates our work: papers, papers, and... more papers. While academic publishing is an essential part of disseminating research results, it is only one activity amongst many that make up a career (or for that matter, a life). The following essay is based on an invited talk for the NSF AAPF Symposium, given at the 2018 Winter AAS Meeting. Here, as in the original talk, I offer some practical advice for thinking about one's work within the larger frame of your personal values and goals. While I will draw examples from my own career, I hope to offer readers guidance in articulating what is important to them, aligning their career choices with those values, and establishing metrics that go beyond the h-index.

Physics Education,Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics,Earth and Planetary Astrophysics,Astrophysics of Galaxies,High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena,Solar and Stellar Astrophysics
Academic-Industrial Collaborations: Merging Paths to Thrive

Hongli Bao,Karla Bravo-Altamirano,Zachary Buchan,Pablo J Cabrera,Sarah J Ryan,Joshua J Roth,Fernando Sartillo-Piscil,Yasuhiro Sawai,Uttam K Tambar,Cayetana Zarate

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.4c01107

IF: 5.2

2024-04-13

Organic Letters

Abstract:Org Lett . 2024 Apr 12;26(14):2669-2671. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.4c01107. NO

chemistry, organic
How to transition from academia to industry and back

Cassandra L. Jacobs

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01864-1

IF: 24.252

2024-04-02

Nature Human Behaviour

Abstract:Researchers have a wide variety of choices when it comes to careers. Often, post-PhD, we leave academic research for industry. But it is also possible to transition back, when done carefully. In this how-to, I outline how to transition between industry and academic research and vice versa.

psychology, experimental,neurosciences,multidisciplinary sciences
Exploring teachers’ career self-management. Considering the roles of organizational career management, occupational self-efficacy, and learning goal orientation.

Piety Runhaar,Machiel Bouwmans,Marjan Vermeulen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2019.1607675

2019-04-30

Human Resource Development International

Abstract:Employees' career development is seen as one of the topics central to HRD (Park and Rothwell <a href="#">2009</a> Park, Y., and W. J. Rothwell. 2009. "The Effects of Organizational Learning Climate, Career-Enhancing Strategy, and Work Orientation on the Protean Career." 12 (4): 387–405. doi:10.1080/13678860903135771.<a href="/servlet/linkout?suffix=CIT0045&dbid=20&doi=10.1080%2F13678868.2019.1607675&key=10.1080%2F13678860903135771&tollfreelink=2_18_4f688d72dcb8aff78220ef00aefc9c335c0a4dc765d52c503230d86b7f51d502">[Taylor & Francis Online]</a> , <a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?hl=en&publication_year=2009&pages=387-405&issue=4&author=Y.+Park&author=W.+J.+Rothwell&title=The+Effects+of+Organizational+Learning+Climate%2C+Career-Enhancing+Strategy%2C+and+Work+Orientation+on+the+Protean+Career">[Google Scholar]</a>; Mehdiabadi et al. <a href="#">2017</a> Mehdiabadi, A. H., G. Seo, W. D. Huang, and S. H. C. Han. 2017. "Building Blocks of Contemporary HRD Research: A Citation Analysis on Human Resource Development Quarterly between 2007 and 2013." New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development 29 (4): 20–34. doi:10.1002/nha3.20197.<a href="/servlet/linkout?suffix=CIT0036&dbid=16&doi=10.1080%2F13678868.2019.1607675&key=10.1002%2Fnha3.20197">[Crossref]</a>, <a href="/servlet/linkout?suffix=CIT0036&dbid=128&doi=10.1080%2F13678868.2019.1607675&key=000416417000003">[Web of Science ®]</a> , <a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?hl=en&publication_year=2017&pages=20-34&issue=4&author=A.+H.+Mehdiabadi&author=G.+Seo&author=W.+D.+Huang&author=S.+H.+C.+Han&title=Building+Blocks+of+Contemporary+HRD+Research%3A+A+Citation+Analysis+on+Human+Resource+Development+Quarterly+between+2007+and+2013">[Google Scholar]</a>; Shuck et al. <a href="#">2018</a> Shuck, B., K. McDonald, T. S. Rocco, M. Byrd, and E. Dawes. 2018. "Human Resources Development and Career Development: Where are We, and Where Do We Need to Go." New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development 30 (1): 3–18. doi:10.1002/nha3.2018.30.issue-1.<a href="/servlet/linkout?suffix=CIT0058&dbid=16&doi=10.1080%2F13678868.2019.1607675&key=10.1002%2Fnha3.20205">[Crossref]</a>, <a href="/servlet/linkout?suffix=CIT0058&dbid=128&doi=10.1080%2F13678868.2019.1607675&key=000424824400002">[Web of Science ®]</a> , <a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?hl=en&publication_year=2018&pages=3-18&issue=1&author=B.+Shuck&author=K.+McDonald&author=T.+S.+Rocco&author=M.+Byrd&author=E.+Dawes&title=Human+Resources+Development+and+Career+Development%3A+Where+are+We%2C+and+Where+Do+We+Need+to+Go">[Google Scholar]</a>). That is, as the range of possible occupational and educational choices in Western societies has increased dramatically (OECD <a href="#">2011</a> OECD. 2011. Education at a Glance 2011: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.<a href="/servlet/linkout?suffix=CIT0044&dbid=16&doi=10.1080%2F13678868.2019.1607675&key=10.1787%2Feag-2011-en">[Crossref]</a> , <a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?hl=en&publication_year=2011&author=OECD&title=Education+at+a+Glance+2011%3A+OECD+Indicators">[Google Scholar]</a>), employees are expected to engage in lifelong learning in order to stay broadly employable (Baruch, Szűcs, and Gunz <a href="#">2015</a> Baruch, Y., N. Szűcs, and H. Gunz. 2015. "Career Studies in Search of Theory: The Rise and Rise of Concepts." Career Development International 20: 3–20. doi:10.1108/CDI-11-2013-0137.<a href="/servlet/linkout?suffix=CIT0007&dbid=16&doi=10.1080%2F13678868.2019.1607675&key=10.1108%2FCDI-11-2013-0137">[Crossref]</a>, <a href="/servlet/linkout?suffix=CIT0007&dbid=128&doi=10.1080%2F13678868.2019.1607675&key=000350576400002">[Web of Science ®]</a> , <a href="http://schol-Abstract Truncated-

English Else
Learning to Prioritize Our Collaborative Opportunities: Overcoming the Bright Shiny Object Syndrome

Ross C Brownson,Danielle R Adams,Adjoa Anyane-Yeboa,Byron J Powell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000529

2023-09-14

Abstract:There are multiple opportunities to participate in team science, leading to long-term benefits (eg, research impact, novelty, productivity). Scholars are not well-trained in how to choose among these opportunities, often learning via trial and error. The ability to navigate collaborations is framed by several principles and considerations: (1) locus of control (what control we have over our own behavior) and how it affects academic job satisfaction; (2) the scarcity mindset that may manifest as a result of the fear of missing future opportunities; and (3) power dynamics and inequities (eg, among women and racial/ethnic minority individuals). To provide a more systematic approach to weighing academic opportunities, the authors offer 30 questions across six overlapping domains. The domains include: the big picture (eg, Is the opportunity a building block for your career?), context (eg, How much do you have on your plate?), person (eg, Who is asking?), team (eg, Is the team productive?), role (eg, Will you lead or assist?), and outcomes (eg, Might the opportunity lead to publications and/or grants?). We offer advice for decision-making. For example, when presented with an opportunity involving a significant time commitment, it is useful to allow at least 24 hours before deciding. The authors offer advice and sample language for communicating your decision. Although every situation is different, there are several fundamental issues and questions to consider when one is presented with a new opportunity-these questions are suggested for mentors and mentees.
The Road Well Traveled: Making Choices, Ensuring Progress While Heeding the “Clarion Call”

E Albert Reece,E. Albert Reece

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/grf.0000000000000853

2024-01-22

Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract:The career path of everyone is quite unique based on the goals and the choices we make, and success can take time to unfold. My career choices have been greatly influenced by remarkable mentors and opportunities. Reciprocally I have had the pleasure, as a faculty member, department chair, and medical school dean to mentor promising young physicians and scientists to launch successful careers. We need to continue to attract physicians and scientists to academic medicine to ensure that our field continues to innovate and improve the lives of our patients. To influence positive change, we must stay relentlessly focused and have faith that success will come.

obstetrics & gynecology
Career pathways, part 14

Angelika Rambold,Santiago Vernia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-024-01056-1

IF: 19.865

2024-05-31

Nature Metabolism

Abstract:Angelika Rambold and Santiago Vernia reflect on how a very early interest in science has shaped their career, their research interests and their mentoring style.

endocrinology & metabolism
Career pathways, part 13

Alexis A. Jourdain,Feilong Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-023-00954-0

IF: 19.865

2024-01-18

Nature Metabolism

Abstract:Following one's passion and curiosity are major drivers for a successful career in science, and finding the right mentors and collaborators is essential in this journey. In the thirteenth part of our Career pathways series, Alexis Jourdain and Feilong Wang share their experience.

endocrinology & metabolism
The Changing Landscape of Doctoral Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: PhD Students, Faculty Advisors, and Preferences for Varied Career Options

David K. Sherman,Lauren Ortosky,Suyi Leong,Christopher Kello,Mary Hegarty

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.711615

IF: 3.8

2021-12-17

Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract:The landscape of graduate science education is changing as efforts to diversify the professoriate have increased because academic faculty jobs at universities have grown scarce and more competitive. With this context as a backdrop, the present research examines the perceptions and career goals of advisors and advisees through surveys of PhD students (Study 1, N = 195) and faculty mentors (Study 2, N = 272) in science, technology, engineering, and math disciplines. Study 1 examined actual preferences and career goals of PhD students among three options: research careers, teaching careers, and non-academic careers in industry, and compared the actual preferences of students with what they perceived as being the normative preferences of faculty. Overall, students had mixed preferences but perceived that their advisors had a strong normative preference for research careers for them. Moreover, students who ranked research positions as most desirable felt the most belonging in their academic departments. Further analyses revealed no differences in career preferences as a function of underrepresented minority (URM) student status or first-generation (FG) status, but URM and FG students felt less belonging in their academic departments. Study 2 examined faculty preferences for different careers for their advisees, both in general and for current students in particular. While faculty advisors preferred students to go into research in general, when focusing on specific students, they saw their preferences as being closely aligned with the career preference of each PhD student. Faculty advisors did not perceive any difference in belonging between their students as a function of their URM status. Discrepancies between student and faculty perceptions may occur, in part, because faculty and students do not engage in sufficient discussions about the wider range of career options beyond academic research. Supporting this possibility, PhD students and faculty advisors reported feeling more comfortable discussing research careers with each other than either non-academic industry positions or teaching positions. Discussion centers on the implications of these findings for interpersonal and institutional efforts to foster diversity in the professoriate and to create open communication about career development.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Career Choice: A Case Study of College Students Shifting Career Paths

Genebelle M. Lao,Desiree Janine F. Villamayor,Finlay Whea H. Campos,Hanz Alecz Q. Dasmariñas,Jean Paul D. Dechavez,Candellen Biadoma-Toledo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijert.v3i2.50077

2022-06-30

Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Technology

Abstract:This study aimed to determine the causes, impacts, and varying perspectives of how two years of education can alter a person's ambitions. A qualitative research design, specifically the case study approach was used in this study. It focused on why the participants enrolled in a college program that was not aligned with their SHS Strand. The responses are subsequently transcribed and themes are identified. Students whose college courses do not correspond to their Senior High School strands have questioned their previous strand selection. This is due to difficulties they encountered as a result of the misalignment. According to the general findings, one of the most important factors to consider when choosing a career is one's interest. It was also evident within the data presented that the finances and practicality of the predetermined college courses that the students chose were weighed into their decision-making. It also shows that the majority of the participants agreed that their families have an impact on their career choices. The study also discovered that doing things that are not one's passion in the first place can be difficult, but it can help people challenge their abilities. The study concludes that indeed, pre-coaching strategies and guidance provided by schools play a large factor in students' awareness of their strengths and weaknesses. Also, setting goals may make the desired changes more difficult; however, the participants rediscovered their inclination and satisfaction with what they have pursued now, which motivated them to continue.
Leaving Academia: Why Do Doctoral Graduates Take Up Non-Academic Jobs and to What Extent Are They Prepared?

Shuhua Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/sgpe-08-2020-0057

2021-01-01

Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education

Abstract:Purpose An increasing number of doctoral graduates are seeking non-academic employment. While statistics have revealed multiple aspects regarding the non-academic employment they hold, there is insufficient documentation of what has led them to leave academia and to what extent they are prepared for non-academic positions. This paper aims to address this gap and reports on five Chinese doctoral graduates' reflections on their change in career choices. Design/methodology/approach This study is exploratory and follows the approach of qualitative multi-case studies. The data includes in-depth interviews with five Chinese doctoral graduates and their responses to a survey. The paper applies a theoretical perspective drawing from protean career and boundaryless career theories, focusing on the participants' agency in managing career choices and their meaning making of career decision-making. Findings The study has found that, besides the factors mentioned in the literature, such as lack of academic positions, pressure related to academic work and lack of career planning, some participants were directed by their intrinsic values, and agency plays an important role in their career preparation. Practical implications The study makes recommendations on university career guidance for doctoral students. Originality/value This paper documents why and how doctoral students change their career choices, which have not been sufficiently documented in the literature. As well, the theoretical perspective used provides an innovative way to interpret doctoral students' career decision-making.
Career Trajectory After General Surgery Residency

Allen Green,Elijah R. Sommer,Max R. Johnson,Hector Gonzalez,Twan Sia,David A. Spain,Jeff Choi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000006307

IF: 13.787

2024-04-23

Annals of Surgery

Abstract:Objective: Determine the proportion of contemporary US academic general surgery residency program graduates who pursue academic careers and identify factors associated with pursuing academic careers. Summary Background Data: Many academic residency programs aim to cultivate academic surgeons, yet the proportion of contemporary graduates who choose academic careers is unclear. The potential determinants that affect graduates’ decisions to pursue academic careers remain underexplored. Methods: We collected program and individual-level data on 2015 and 2018 graduates across 96 US academic general surgery residency programs using public resources. We defined those pursuing academic careers as faculty within US allopathic medical school-affiliated surgery departments who published two or more peer-reviewed publications as the first or senior author between 2020-2021. After variable selection using sample splitting LASSO regression, multivariable regression evaluated association with pursuing academic careers among all graduates, and graduates of top-20 residency programs. Secondary analysis using multivariable ordinal regression explored factors associated with high research productivity during early faculty years. Results: Among 992 graduates, 166 (17%) were pursuing academic careers according to our definition. Graduating from a top-20 ranked residency program (OR[95%CI]: 2.34[1.40-3.88]), working with a longitudinal research mentor during residency (OR[95%CI]: 2.21[1.24-3.95]), holding an advanced degree (OR[95%CI]: 2.20[1.19-3.99]), and the number of peer-reviewed publications during residency as first or senior author (OR[95%CI]: 1.13[1.07-1.20]) were associated with pursuing an academic surgery career, while the number of peer-reviewed publications before residency was not (OR[95%CI]: 1.08[0.99-1.20]). Among top 20 program graduates, working with a longitudinal research mentor during residency (OR[95%CI]: 0.95[0.43-2.09]) was not associated with pursuing an academic surgery career. The number of peer-reviewed publications during residency as first or senior author was the only variable associated with higher productivity during early faculty years (OR[95%CI]: 1.12[1.07-1.18]). Conclusions: Our findings suggest programs that aim to graduate academic surgeons may benefit from ensuring trainees receive infrastructural support and demonstrate sustained commitment to research throughout residency. Our results should be interpreted cautiously as the impact of unmeasured confounders is unclear.

surgery
Choose Your Own Career Adventure

Robin L. Flanigan,Jerry Guerra

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2024-mar4

2024-06-24

Mechanical Engineering

Abstract:The demand for engineers means these early career professionals can afford to evaluate career moves beyond simply securing a paid position. They can consider their options with regards to remote work, office culture, advanced degrees, and more.

engineering, mechanical
Focused for Some, Exploratory for Others: Job Search Strategies and Successful University-to-Work Transitions in the Context of Labor Market Ambiguity

Belgin Okay-Somerville,Dora Scholarios

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08948453211016058

2021-05-18

Journal of Career Development

Abstract:This article examines the role of student job search strategies that differ in goal-directedness (focused, exploratory, and haphazard) in achieving successful university-to-work transitions (i.e., employment in jobs with high skill use/development and qualification–job match). The relationship between job search and employment outcomes is considered in two labor market contexts—high or low ambiguity—which are represented by the comparison between arts, humanities, and social sciences (AHSS) and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) graduates, respectively. Using two-wave survey data, we find that job search strategies during university do not explain, yet differentially impact, successful outcomes one year after graduation. Fully exploring opportunities was particularly beneficial for STEM graduates (low ambiguity context) and more focused job search was beneficial for AHSS graduates (high ambiguity context). Paradoxically, findings both question and reinforce the efficacy of career agency for overcoming barriers to labor market entry, depending on the job search context. The study contributes to the agency and context debates relevant for school-to-work transitions.

psychology, applied
Where postdoctoral journeys lead

Yueran Duan,Shahan Ali Memon,Bedoor AlShebli,Qing Guan,Petter Holme,Talal Rahwan

2024-11-06

Abstract:Postdoctoral training is a career stage often described as a demanding and anxiety-laden time when many promising PhDs see their academic dreams slip away due to circumstances beyond their control. We use a unique data set of academic publishing and careers to chart the more or less successful postdoctoral paths. We build a measure of academic success on the citation patterns two to five years into a faculty career. Then, we monitor how students' postdoc positions -- in terms of relocation, change of topic, and early well-cited papers -- relate to their early-career success. One key finding is that the postdoc period seems more important than the doctoral training to achieve this form of success. This is especially interesting in light of the many studies of academic faculty hiring that link Ph.D. granting institutions and hires, omitting the postdoc stage. Another group of findings can be summarized as a Goldilocks principle: it seems beneficial to change one's direction, but not too much.

Computers and Society,Physics and Society
Pluralistic ignorance and occupational choice: The impact of communicating norms on graduate students' career aspirations

Suyi Leong,Mary Hegarty,David K. Sherman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.13028

2024-04-17

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Abstract:Occupational choices at the early stage of one's career path are influenced by the real and imagined input of mentors. This research focuses on PhD advisors and the graduate students that they mentor. Each participant in that dyadic mentoring relationship holds assumptions about the beliefs of the other regarding the students' career preferences. We propose that, in the absence of discussions surrounding career goals in such relationships, pluralistic ignorance surrounding career norms may develop. PhD students may assume that their advisors prefer that students seek academic research positions; while advisors may assume students prefer academic research positions and may not bring up alternative careers. Three studies adopt a mixed‐method approach to investigate divergent experiences surrounding career discussions. Study 1A (N = 301 faculty members in STEM fields) features qualitative and quantitative data and found that PhD advisors have experience working with students whose career preferences did not align with their expectations, and report changing their mentorship approaches while maintaining rigorous training. Study 1B (N = 195 PhD students in STEM fields) features qualitative data and found that students, although generally comfortable discussing different career options with their advisors, report several concerns that deterred them from discussing nonacademic research positions. Study 2, an experiment designed to compare perceived with actual norms (N = 200 PhD students in STEM fields) revealed that such discomfort could be alleviated by making explicit advisors' support for diverse career options and actual career preferences. The present research provides insights about pluralistic ignorance with implications for having more holistic career discussions in dyadic mentor relationships.

psychology, social
Postdoctoral Positions As Preparation For Desired Careers: A Narrative Approach To Understanding Postdoctoral Experience

shuhua chen,lynn mcalpine,cheryl amundsen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1024633

2015-01-01

Higher Education Research & Development

Abstract:Doing a postdoc' following a doctorate is becoming more and more common worldwide as the pre-tenure job market continues shrinking in relation to the number of PhD graduates. Yet, behind statistics and descriptions of collective experience, how individuals experience the postdoctoral period is largely unknown, especially how they use this phase as preparation for future employment. Drawing on longitudinal data, this paper provides a close look at how seven postdoctoral scholars in life sciences from two Canadian universities intentionally prepared for their desired careers through day-to-day activities. The participants' daily activities were situated in three ways: intellectual, networking and institutional. It was found that they were all agentive in preparing for the future; yet, agency was exercised differently due to different institutional and personal contexts. The personal was found to be a significant factor that influenced their career preparations and decisions. This study addresses the gap in the literature regarding postdoctoral experiences and enriches our understanding about postdoctoral experience and training.
Entering Exits: Exploring the Career Path of Graduating Senior High School Students and Influential Factors

Reyles James Christian J,Pineda Jazel,Suminod Lea S,Lazaro Bryan Louis G

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62225/2583049x.2024.4.3.2828

2024-05-24

Abstract:This research investigates the career paths chosen by Graduating Senior High School Students and the various factors that influence these decisions. The study addresses key issues such as the specific career preferences of these students, the factors shaping their choices, the impact of these factors, and the challenges they face in pursuing their careers. It also explores how students cope with these obstacles. The problem exists due to a combination of limited career guidance, socioeconomic factors, family expectations, and the evolving job market, which collectively create uncertainty and pressure for students making significant career decisions at a young age. The research addressed the questions by surveying one-hundred (100) graduating seniors at Noveleta Senior High School and interviewing ten (10) of them to explore their career preferences, the factors influencing these choices, and the challenges they face. The findings revealed that students' preferred career path is college education. The result also shows that their career path preference are influenced by their interests, family expectations, and financial situations, with many balancing personal passions against economic realities. This research highlights the need for comprehensive career guidance that supports students in navigating both their aspirations and the practical challenges they encounter.

Academia or Industry: Lessons on Choosing Career Paths─There May Be More Than One Fork in the Road Ahead

Career Pathways, Part 10

Choices for Ph.D.s in Engineering: Analyses of Career Paths in Academia and Industry

Choose Your Own Adventure: Developing A Values-Oriented Framework for Your Career

Academic-Industrial Collaborations: Merging Paths to Thrive

How to transition from academia to industry and back

Exploring teachers’ career self-management. Considering the roles of organizational career management, occupational self-efficacy, and learning goal orientation.

Learning to Prioritize Our Collaborative Opportunities: Overcoming the Bright Shiny Object Syndrome

The Road Well Traveled: Making Choices, Ensuring Progress While Heeding the “Clarion Call”

Career pathways, part 14

Career pathways, part 13

The Changing Landscape of Doctoral Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: PhD Students, Faculty Advisors, and Preferences for Varied Career Options

Career Choice: A Case Study of College Students Shifting Career Paths

Leaving Academia: Why Do Doctoral Graduates Take Up Non-Academic Jobs and to What Extent Are They Prepared?

Career Trajectory After General Surgery Residency

Choose Your Own Career Adventure

Focused for Some, Exploratory for Others: Job Search Strategies and Successful University-to-Work Transitions in the Context of Labor Market Ambiguity

Where postdoctoral journeys lead

Pluralistic ignorance and occupational choice: The impact of communicating norms on graduate students' career aspirations

Postdoctoral Positions As Preparation For Desired Careers: A Narrative Approach To Understanding Postdoctoral Experience

Entering Exits: Exploring the Career Path of Graduating Senior High School Students and Influential Factors