Globalizing Patient Capital: The Political Economy of Chinese Finance in the Americas. By Stephen B. Kaplan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. 300p. $84.99 cloth, $34.99 paper.
Victoria Chonn Ching
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592722000524
2022-06-01
Perspectives on Politics
Abstract:trust must be high enough that successful collective action, which is important for generating public goods, is likely. (Although the authors discuss JeremyWeinstein’s research on the role of an insurgent’s source of finances as an influence on behavior, whether a leader draws resources from the general population or from a scarce resource does not seem to play much of a role in their effort to develop a general explanation.) There are feedback loops among these three elements, which means that ameliorating one may make the others easier to realize in time two. Further, where conditions are supportive and the probability of success is higher, the motivation to invest also increases. Thus, as in other related efforts to account for patterns of state success or failure, a policy maker could try to induce a healthy upward spiral by securing improvement in any one of the three elements, or at least that is where I think the analysis leads us. The middle chapters of the book proceed thematically and explore empirical evidence within three main areas: security provision; human rights, rule of law, and democracy; and social welfare. The chapters are well worth a read, but I want to use scarce ink here to raise a few issues that may merit further discussion and perhaps a second volume. At times one worries that the definition and measurement of the outcome—governance quality or effectiveness —is awfully close to some of the right-hand side variables, the independent variables. Are they really distinct? Legitimacy, in particular, seems to pop up on both sides. Alternatively, if the three supporting conditions are present, would it not be likely that something like a state is already present? Almost any kind of service delivery involves some measure of hierarchy, even if it is fairly flat. The proposition that governance is more effective in the context of a hierarchically ordered service delivery system that is perceived as legitimate by people who already trust one another seems a bit tautological. The authors define what they mean by nonstate provision of a service quite broadly, which may concern some of us. Traditional leaders, warlords, and private firms (think company towns and the Dutch East India company, for example) may be the source of authority and investment in service delivery or governance—and some will likely read the book for what it has to say about variation in performance among these actors. However, the volume also includes international organizations, UN peacekeeping missions, and international NGOs as providers of governance in the context of anarchy. There are good reasons to do so, but for those interested in whether communities can stand on their own, this addition skews the discussion a bit. If Doctors without Borders or other international NGOs are able to provide quality health care in a region such as the eastern DRC, howmuch does that really tell us about governance? People may have better access to health services than they would have had otherwise, but this is an instance of substitution, not production. The only thing local leaders or warlords have to do is refrain from pestering these groups. Is that governance? Finally, the book’s focus on interrelationships between trust, legitimacy, and institutional design at times leads to avoidance of the steep challenges societies face when confronted with an aggressor or a leader unashamed to employ coercion. Community leaders or company towns in settings where drug cartels or extremists can kill and maim with abandon face a difficult security challenge not likely to yield to negotiation. Faced with a choice between supporting a respected local leader or saving one’s family, the latter is more likely to prevail. Power trumps legitimacy. The chapter on security wades into this subject a bit, but overall the text is a bit short on suggestions for violence-affected communities in Mexico, in the Sahel, or in Afghanistan. Absolutely, the book is worth a close read. It is a bit longer than it needs to be, but many of the passages that seem to cover familiar terrain introduce more links to an ungainly literature that has needed someone to assemble the pieces and whip it into shape. The authors have done us a service, even if the book isn’t the last word on the subject.
Political Science,Economics