Russia’s Coercive Diplomacy: Energy, Cyber, and Maritime Policy as New Sources of Power. By Ryan C. Maness and Brandon Valeriano. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. 250p. $109.99 cloth.
David W. Rivera
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592718002335
2018-11-23
Perspectives on Politics
Abstract:data might have explored in greater depth is why some donors (e.g., the European Commission) have remained champions of budget support. Have these continued users of budget support avoided the credible commitment problems that have befallen other donors, or do these donors persist in their use of budget support despite these commitment problems? In either case, the answer might have shed further light on the credible commitment problem central to the book and the role of this commitment problem in the choice and sustainability of aid delivery mechanisms. More generally, as Swedlund acknowledges, donor agencies are a heterogeneous group, as are recipient country governments. This heterogeneity offers empirical leverage on the central concerns of the book: We might imagine that some donors, like multilateral aid agencies or bilateral donors with stable ruling coalitions, have longer time horizons and face fewer commitment problems. Recipient countries, including the four countries where Swedlund’s interviews take place, also have varying levels of stability. To extend the author’s dance floor metaphor, the shape, agility, and desires of the dancers clearly impact how the dance proceeds. Tome, at least, not using her rich data to explore these dynamics feels like a missed opportunity. In the concluding Chapter 7, Swedlund notes the ability of new and growing donors (e.g., China) to alter existing bargaining dynamics. She also discusses the rise of a new trend in aid delivery, Results-Based Aid, through the lens of credible commitment problems. These discussions suggest but a few of the directions for future work opened up by the work. Swedlund’s bargaining model, and focus on credible commitments as a key feature of aid bargaining, can serve as tools for practitioners and scholars alike. As she puts it in her typically elegant prose, “if we want to improve the delivery of foreign aid, we have to break open the black box of donor-government relations” (p. 131). While I believe that this book may not be fully convincing in what Chapter 7 describes as its second purpose—to tightly link credible commitment problems to the political sustainability of aid delivery mechanisms— I believe it is quite convincing on its first aim. It does indeed advance “our understanding of what donor agencies and recipient governments bargain and negotiate over and how these negotiations affect choices regarding how foreign aid is actually delivered to beneficiaries in recipient countries” (p. 123). It is the rare book that prompts one to realize assumptions implicit in a literature one knows well but had never considered. Swedlund is right, in my view, that almost all work on aid agencies and their interactions with recipient governments frame the problem through delegation: of aid agencies to their agents, or from agencies to recipient countries. The author’s bargaining frame, by simultaneously animating both donors and recipients, opens the door to a more nuanced understanding of donor–recipient dynamics: to understanding what steps each takes in the dance, with what results, and how they affect the couple’s position on the dance floor. Scholars interested in the interactions of developing and developed countries or those interested in the outcomes of aid efforts from a wide variety of disciplines— for example, those with interests in international relations and political economy; public administration and service delivery in developing counties; development studies and development economics—will all benefit from this engaging book. Practitioners involved in the aid bargain will also almost certainly benefit from this work, which brings what I suspect many will find to be a useful, broader frame to their lived experience. Swedlund has taken a big step forward in explaining the dance of development assistance, and her book deserves to be widely read.
Environmental Science,Political Science