Abstract:Good writing is about having something interesting and original to say. Generative AI tools might provide technical help, but they are no substitute for your unique perspective.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **The roles, limitations and potential risks of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in scientific communication**.
Specifically, the article explores the following issues:
1. **The potential and limitations of generative AI in scientific communication**:
- GenAI can help create engaging content and reach a wider audience, thus democratizing scientific communication.
- However, GenAI currently has technical limitations, such as "hallucinations" (i.e., generating inaccurate or fictional information) and "knowledge cut - off dates" (i.e., lacking the latest information).
2. **Concerns about diversity and cultural adaptability**:
- The widespread use of GenAI may reduce the diversity of science communicators, leading to a single - culture phenomenon ("monoculture") that is mainly English - speaking and centered on the Western world.
- Such a monoculture may overlook the needs of audiences in specific cultures and regions.
3. **The role of generative AI in scientific writing**:
- AI can assist in the writing process, for example, by providing functions such as brainstorming, language polishing, translation and text summarization.
- But AI lacks critical thinking and extensive background knowledge and cannot replace the role of human editors in developmental editing.
4. **Ethical and cognitive risks**:
- If scientists rely too much on AI as a knowledge - production partner, it may bring cognitive risks.
- In the wrong hands, GenAI may be used to create and spread scientific misinformation.
5. **Core principles of writing**:
- The article cites the view of mathematician Paul Halmos, emphasizing that good writing must have clear ideas and expressed content. AI tools can help improve writing quality, but cannot replace the author's unique perspective and ideas.
In summary, this paper aims to explore the application prospects of generative AI in scientific communication and the challenges it brings, especially how to balance its advantages with potential risks and ensure the quality and diversity of scientific communication.