Abstract:The growing demand of Internet of things based portable gadgets motivate to develop low power static random access memory (SRAM) cell. It occupies large portion in modern system on chip devices. In this context, a detailed review on various SRAM cell topologies has been performed which includes comparative analysis of design parameters and challenges. To perform the comparative analysis, considered SRAM cell topologies are simulated with cadence virtuoso IC6.1.5-64b at 45 nm generic process design kit technology file. It is worthy to notice that 9T SRAM cell has highest value of read stability among considered cells. It is attributed to use of differential read decoupled structure. The 7T SRAM cell has highest value of write ability among considered cells. It is observed that 8T SRAM cell has lowest read power dissipation among considered cells. It happens due to the use of stack transistor in read path of the cell. The lowest value of read access time is also observed in 8T SRAM cell among considered SRAM cells. It is 1.82×\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\times$$\end{document} higher as compared to conventional 6T SRAM cell. Further, the write access time of 9T SRAM cell is lowest among considered cells. This is 1.41×\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\times$$\end{document} less as compared to conventional 6T SRAM cell. Static noise per unit area to power delay product ratio (SAPR) is used to evaluate the overall performance of considered SRAM topologies. It is observed that 8T SRAM cell has the highest value of SAPR among considered SRAM cells. It is 1.91×\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\times$$\end{document} as compared to conventional 6T SRAM cell. All the comparison has been done at 1.0 V supply voltage.

Analyzing the Performance of 6T SRAM Cell and 64×64 Memory Array at Lower Technology Nodes for Low Power Design

Performance Analysis of 9T SRAM using 180nm, 90nm, 65nm, 32nm, 14nm CMOS Technologies

A Review on Performance Evaluation of Different Low Power SRAM Cells in Nano-Scale Era

SRAM Cell Design Challenges in Modern Deep Sub-Micron Technologies: An Overview

Design and Implement of Low Power Consumption SRAM Based on Single Port Sense Amplifier in 65 Nm

Towards Efficient Memory Architectures: Low-Power Noise-Immune RRAM

Performance Analysis of 6T and 9T SRAM

Design analysis of a low-power, high-speed 8 T SRAM cell using dual-threshold CNTFETs

A Low-Energy, Stable, Single-Bitline Accessed FinFET 9T-SRAM

A 0.33 V 2.5 Μw Cross-Point Data-Aware Write Structure, Read-Half-select Disturb-Free Sub-Threshold SRAM in 130 Nm CMOS

A Highly Reliable and Low-Power Cross-Coupled 18T SRAM Cell

Dynamic Power Reduction in a Novel CMOS 5T-SRAM for Low-Power SoC

Novel 15T SRAM Cell for Low Voltage High Reliability Application

A Dual Core Oxide 8T SRAM Cell with Low Vccmin and Dual Voltage Supplies in 45nm Triple Gate Oxide and Multi Vt CMOS for Very High Performance Yet Low Leakage Mobile SoC Applications

Design of dual port 9T SRAM cell with parallel processing and high performance computing

Architectural Exploration of Application-Specific Resonant SRAM Compute-in-Memory (rCiM)

Resonant Energy Recycling SRAM Architecture

Analysing digital in-memory computing for advanced finFET node

13.2 A 14nm FinFET 128Mb 6T SRAM with VMIN-enhancement techniques for low-power applications

Highly Area-Efficient Low-Power SRAM Cell with 2 Transistors and 2 Resistors

-Memory Computing Based Reliable and High Speed Schmitt trigger 10T SRAM cell design