Abstract:The growing demand of Internet of things based portable gadgets motivate to develop low power static random access memory (SRAM) cell. It occupies large portion in modern system on chip devices. In this context, a detailed review on various SRAM cell topologies has been performed which includes comparative analysis of design parameters and challenges. To perform the comparative analysis, considered SRAM cell topologies are simulated with cadence virtuoso IC6.1.5-64b at 45 nm generic process design kit technology file. It is worthy to notice that 9T SRAM cell has highest value of read stability among considered cells. It is attributed to use of differential read decoupled structure. The 7T SRAM cell has highest value of write ability among considered cells. It is observed that 8T SRAM cell has lowest read power dissipation among considered cells. It happens due to the use of stack transistor in read path of the cell. The lowest value of read access time is also observed in 8T SRAM cell among considered SRAM cells. It is 1.82×\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\times$$\end{document} higher as compared to conventional 6T SRAM cell. Further, the write access time of 9T SRAM cell is lowest among considered cells. This is 1.41×\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\times$$\end{document} less as compared to conventional 6T SRAM cell. Static noise per unit area to power delay product ratio (SAPR) is used to evaluate the overall performance of considered SRAM topologies. It is observed that 8T SRAM cell has the highest value of SAPR among considered SRAM cells. It is 1.91×\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\times$$\end{document} as compared to conventional 6T SRAM cell. All the comparison has been done at 1.0 V supply voltage.

Performance Analysis of 6T and 9T SRAM

Performance Analysis of 9T SRAM using 180nm, 90nm, 65nm, 32nm, 14nm CMOS Technologies

Design of dual port 9T SRAM cell with parallel processing and high performance computing

Design analysis of a low-power, high-speed 8 T SRAM cell using dual-threshold CNTFETs

A 256kb 9T Near-Threshold SRAM With 1k Cells per Bit-Line and Enhanced Write and Read Operations

Analyzing the Performance of 6T SRAM Cell and 64×64 Memory Array at Lower Technology Nodes for Low Power Design

A Review on Performance Evaluation of Different Low Power SRAM Cells in Nano-Scale Era

Novel 15T SRAM Cell for Low Voltage High Reliability Application

-Memory Computing Based Reliable and High Speed Schmitt trigger 10T SRAM cell design

8T1R: A Novel Low-power High-speed RRAM-based Non-volatile SRAM Design.

A Low-Energy, Stable, Single-Bitline Accessed FinFET 9T-SRAM

Analysis of a read disturb-free 9T SRAM cell with bit-interleaving capability.

Charge recycling 8T SRAM design for low voltage robust operation

An 8T-SRAM for Variability Tolerance and Low-Voltage Operation in High-Performance Caches

High Noise Margin 12T Subthreshold SRAM Cell with Enhanced Read Speed and Eliminated Half-Selected Problem

A CNTFET Based Stable, Single-Ended 7T SRAM cell With Improved Write Operation

A low power static noise margin enhanced reliable 8 T SRAM cell

A Design of Subthreshold SRAM Cell Based on RSCE and RNCE.

A Reliable Low Standby Power 10T SRAM Cell With Expanded Static Noise Margins

CNTFET-based Data Independent Power Efficient and Robust 8T SRAM Cell

A FinFET based low-power write enhanced SRAM cell with improved stability