Abstract:Abstract Climate science provides strong evidence of the necessity of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C, in line with the Paris Climate Agreement. The IPCC 1.5 °C special report (SR1.5) presents 414 emissions scenarios modelled for the report, of which around 50 are classified as ‘1.5 °C scenarios’, with no or low temperature overshoot. These emission scenarios differ in their reliance on individual mitigation levers, including reduction of global energy demand, decarbonisation of energy production, development of land-management systems, and the pace and scale of deploying carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies. The reliance of 1.5 °C scenarios on these levers needs to be critically assessed in light of the potentials of the relevant technologies and roll-out plans. We use a set of five parameters to bundle and characterise the mitigation levers employed in the SR1.5 1.5 °C scenarios. For each of these levers, we draw on the literature to define ‘medium’ and ‘high’ upper bounds that delineate between their ‘reasonable’, ‘challenging’ and ‘speculative’ use by mid century. We do not find any 1.5 °C scenarios that stay within all medium upper bounds on the five mitigation levers. Scenarios most frequently ‘over use’ CDR with geological storage as a mitigation lever, whilst reductions of energy demand and carbon intensity of energy production are ‘over used’ less frequently. If we allow mitigation levers to be employed up to our high upper bounds, we are left with 22 of the SR1.5 1.5 °C scenarios with no or low overshoot. The scenarios that fulfil these criteria are characterised by greater coverage of the available mitigation levers than those scenarios that exceed at least one of the high upper bounds. When excluding the two scenarios that exceed the SR1.5 carbon budget for limiting global warming to 1.5 °C, this subset of 1.5 °C scenarios shows a range of 15–22 Gt CO 2 (16–22 Gt CO 2 interquartile range) for emissions in 2030. For the year of reaching net zero CO 2 emissions the range is 2039–2061 (2049–2057 interquartile range).

Emission pathways consistent with a 2 C global temperature limit

The role of carbon capture, utilization, and storage for economic pathways that limit global warming to below 1.5C

What does the 2 C target imply for a global climate agreement in 2020? The LIMITS study on Durban Platform scenarios

RCP2. 6: exploring the possibility to keep global mean temperature increase below 2 C

Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C

Pathways limiting warming to 1.5° C: a tale of turning around in no time?

Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 C

Meeting the EU 2 C climate target: global and regional emission implications

Adaptive emission reduction approach to reach any global warming target

Multi-gas emission envelopes to meet greenhouse gas concentration targets: costs versus certainty of limiting temperature increase

All options, not silver bullets, needed to limit global warming to 1.5 °C: a scenario appraisal

Global fossil fuel reduction pathways under different climate mitigation strategies and ambitions

National GHG Emissions Reduction Pledges and 2°C: Comparison of Studies

Net zero-emission pathways reduce the physical and economic risks of climate change

The challenge to keep global warming below 2 °C

Persistent growth of CO2 emissions and implications for reaching climate targets

Greenhouse gas reduction pathways in the UNFCCC Process up to 2025. Technical Report

Cost and attainability of meeting stringent climate targets without overshoot

Overconfidence in climate overshoot

Climate Change: Overview of state of research

Exploring IMAGE model scenarios that keep greenhouse gas radiative forcing below 3 W/m2 in 2100