Abstract:Abstract Climate science provides strong evidence of the necessity of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C, in line with the Paris Climate Agreement. The IPCC 1.5 °C special report (SR1.5) presents 414 emissions scenarios modelled for the report, of which around 50 are classified as ‘1.5 °C scenarios’, with no or low temperature overshoot. These emission scenarios differ in their reliance on individual mitigation levers, including reduction of global energy demand, decarbonisation of energy production, development of land-management systems, and the pace and scale of deploying carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies. The reliance of 1.5 °C scenarios on these levers needs to be critically assessed in light of the potentials of the relevant technologies and roll-out plans. We use a set of five parameters to bundle and characterise the mitigation levers employed in the SR1.5 1.5 °C scenarios. For each of these levers, we draw on the literature to define ‘medium’ and ‘high’ upper bounds that delineate between their ‘reasonable’, ‘challenging’ and ‘speculative’ use by mid century. We do not find any 1.5 °C scenarios that stay within all medium upper bounds on the five mitigation levers. Scenarios most frequently ‘over use’ CDR with geological storage as a mitigation lever, whilst reductions of energy demand and carbon intensity of energy production are ‘over used’ less frequently. If we allow mitigation levers to be employed up to our high upper bounds, we are left with 22 of the SR1.5 1.5 °C scenarios with no or low overshoot. The scenarios that fulfil these criteria are characterised by greater coverage of the available mitigation levers than those scenarios that exceed at least one of the high upper bounds. When excluding the two scenarios that exceed the SR1.5 carbon budget for limiting global warming to 1.5 °C, this subset of 1.5 °C scenarios shows a range of 15–22 Gt CO 2 (16–22 Gt CO 2 interquartile range) for emissions in 2030. For the year of reaching net zero CO 2 emissions the range is 2039–2061 (2049–2057 interquartile range).

Pathways limiting warming to 1.5° C: a tale of turning around in no time?

The role of carbon capture, utilization, and storage for economic pathways that limit global warming to below 1.5C

Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 C

Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C

On the Chances of Staying below the 1.5°C Warming Target

All options, not silver bullets, needed to limit global warming to 1.5 °C: a scenario appraisal

Emission pathways consistent with a 2 C global temperature limit

Residual fossil CO2 emissions in 1.5–2 °C pathways

Global fossil fuel reduction pathways under different climate mitigation strategies and ambitions

Assessing China's efforts to pursue the 1.5°C warming limit

Pathways for Balancing CO2 Emissions and Sinks

Assessing China’s Efforts to Pursue the 1.5°C Warming Limit

Limiting global warming to below 1.5 °C from 2 °C: An energy-system-based multi-model analysis for China

Assessing China’s efforts to pursue the 1.5 C warming limit

Alternative pathways to the 1.5 C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies

The impact of Earth system feedbacks on carbon budgets and climate response

Current fossil fuel infrastructure does not yet commit us to 1.5 °C warming

(In)Sufficiency of industrial decarbonization to reduce household carbon footprints to 1.5 °C-compatible levels

Emission Scenario Analysis for China under the Global 1.5 °C Target

Rethinking Wedges