Abstract:Oil, coal, and gas account for approximately 80% of global primary energy, but only a portion of total airborne CO2eq (approx. 35% at GWP20 to 65% at GWP100), even though they account for 95% of total measured CO2 emissions. The benefits of these energy sources, as well as their related costs, are not all incorporated in current energy policy discussions. Global greenhouse gas policies must include documented changes in measured airborne CO2eq to avoid spending large amounts of public funds on ineffective or sub-optimal policies. The authors examined airborne CO2, which is less than half of emitted CO2, as well as reported CH4 emissions and the global warming potential of CH4 as published by the IPCC for coal and natural gas. The surprising conclusion is that surfaced-mined coal appears 'better for the climate' than the average natural gas, and all coal appears beneficial over LNG. Therefore, current CO2-only reduction policies and CO2 taxes are leading to unintended consequences and the switch from coal to natural gas, especially LNG, will not have the desired impact of reducing predicted future global warming; in fact, quite the contrary. A large portion of anthropogenic global warming is attributed by the IPCC and IEA to CH4, but it must be noted that CH4 emissions from natural sources and from agriculture account for approximately 40% and 25% of annual global CH4 emissions respectively. Energy accounts for about 20% of documented CH4 emissions. CO2 contributes only approximately 35% of annual airborne anthropogenic GHG emissions after accounting for CH4, over a 20-year horizon. At a 100-year horizon, the contribution of CO2 increases to approximately 60%. Energy policies that do not consider all GHG emissions along the entire value chain will lead to undesired economic and environmental distortions. All carbon taxation and CO2 pricing schemes are incorrect and need to be revised. At IPCC's GWP20 an approximately 2%1 higher loss of CH4 across the value chain prior to combustion of natural gas versus coal will lead to 'climate parity' of coal with natural gas. According to public data, natural gas value chains have high CH4 and undocumented CO2 losses. On a global average, using only IEA-documented CH4 data, natural gas emits approximately 15% more CO2eq than surface-mined coal, over a 20-year horizon. This difference will increase as the use of shale gas and LNG expands. Investors should support all energy systems in a manner that avoids an energy crisis, including intermittent renewable energy systems where they make sense. If CO2 emissions need to be reduced, one of the most effective ways would be to install ultra-supercritical power plants with CCUS technology. However, the undisputed benefits of increased CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere because of its promotion of photosynthesis and plant growth effects (fertilization) need to be considered in energy policy decisions as well. The authors suggest that future research and development should concentrate on reducing net emissions from fossil fuel power plants and providing cost-effective and reliable new conventional power generation capacity, utilizing clean coal and clean natural gas technology.

Global fossil fuel reduction pathways under different climate mitigation strategies and ambitions

The role of carbon capture, utilization, and storage for economic pathways that limit global warming to below 1.5C

Coal transitions—part 2: phase-out dynamics in global long-term mitigation scenarios

Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C

Key uncertainties behind global projections of direct air capture deployment

The role of carbon capture, utilization, and storage for economic pathways that limit global warming to below 1.5°C

Climate change and fossil fuel production cuts: assessing global supply-side constraints and policy implications

Pathways for Balancing CO2 Emissions and Sinks

All options, not silver bullets, needed to limit global warming to 1.5 °C: a scenario appraisal

Regional Emission Pathways, Energy Transition Paths and Cost Analysis under Various Effort-Sharing Approaches for Meeting Paris Agreement Goals

The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report WGIII climate assessment of mitigation pathways: from emissions to global temperatures

(In)Sufficiency of industrial decarbonization to reduce household carbon footprints to 1.5 °C-compatible levels

The 1.5°C Target and Coal Sector Transition: at the Limits of Societal Feasibility

How uncertainty in technology costs and carbon dioxide removal availability affect climate mitigation pathways

Implications of the international reduction pledges on long-term energy system changes and costs in China and India

Emission Scenario Analysis for China under the Global 1.5 °C Target

Forecasts of the trend in global-mean temperature to 2100 arising from the scenarios of first-difference CO2 and peak fossil fuel

Energy requirements and carbon emissions for a low-carbon energy transition

Climate impacts of fossil fuels in todays electricity systems

The changing mix of fossil fuels used and the related evolution of CO2 emissions

Global climate change and the mitigation challenge