Abstract:Even if surface warming could be kept below 2.0°C or 1.5°C by 2100, global sea-level rise will occur for several centuries or even millennia. One possible interpretation of a successful climate policy for the next few decades could be that it should avoid global-warming induced impacts on climate, ecosystems and human societies not only within this century, but also for the next centuries and beyond. Here, we perform a proof-of-concept study to introduce a constraint on SLR as a new climate target and compare the economic impact to that of a corresponding temperature target.In the 21st yearly session of the Conference of the Parties in Paris in 2015, SLR threats to the Small Island Developing States (SIDS) prompted a commitment to strive for a lower global temperature target goal of limiting surface warming below 1.5°C. However, an SLR target more directly relates to their existential threats. We here substantially augmented the climate model of the optimizing climate-energy-economy model MIND (Model of Investment and Technological Development) from an impulse-response model to a three-layer ocean model with much-improved representation of ocean heat uptake. We introduce a global total SLR model with four components, one due to ocean thermal expansion, one due to Greenland ice-sheet melting, one due to Antarctic ice-sheet melting, and one due to mountain glaciers and ice cap melting. The newly developed integrated-assessment framework has enabled us to investigate, for the first time, a sea-level rise climate target.Our results emphasize a key effect of carbon emissions pathways on the future SLR after the 21st century. The shape of carbon emissions pathways will strongly influence future SLR after the 21st century and generally affect SIDS over centuries. To reduce SLR-induced impacts on SIDS, a target is required that not only keeps surface warming below a certain level but also reduces surface warming substantially thereafter. We find that a global SLR target will provide a more sustainable and a lower-cost solution to limit both short-term and long-term climate changes for stakeholders who primarily care about SLR among all global warming impact categories compared to a temperature target with the same SLR by 2200.We find that the SLR target can provide a temperature overshoot profile through a physical constraint rather than arbitrarily defining an overshoot range of temperature as acceptable. Temperature targets with a limited overshoot have been invoked to make the 2.0° and 1.5°C targets feasible in the context of real-world United Nations climate policy; however, rational constraints on the temperature overshoot have been unclear. SLR targets can be viewed as a reinterpretation of the 2.0° and 1.5°C targets and can provide a rational justification of a certain temperature overshoot for stakeholders who primarily care about SLR. Our present framework with reinterpretation of the widely agreed temperature targets can, in principle, be transferred from SLR targets to impact-related climate targets and can be used to identify a more sustainable path toward meeting the Paris Agreement.

What does the 2 C target imply for a global climate agreement in 2020? The LIMITS study on Durban Platform scenarios

Long-term climate implications of twenty-first century options for carbon dioxide emission mitigation

National GHG Emissions Reduction Pledges and 2°C: Comparison of Studies

All options, not silver bullets, needed to limit global warming to 1.5 °C: a scenario appraisal

Climate Change: Overview of state of research

Using global sea-level rise targets to find optimal temperature overshoot profile

Differential climate impacts for policy-relevant limits to global warming: the case of 1.5 °C and 2 °C

Points of No Return to Respect the Paris Agreement

An Integrated Assessment for Achieving the 2°C Target Pathway in China by 2030

The 2 °C Global Temperature Target and the Evolution of the Long-Term Goal of Addressing Climate Change—From the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Changeto the Paris Agreement

Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C

Adaptive emission reduction approach to reach any global warming target

Levers of climate pledges influencing the Paris Agreement target

An integrated assessment for achieving the 2C target pathway in China by 2030

Exploring effective short-lived climate pollutant mitigation scenarios by considering synergies and trade-offs of combinations of air pollutant measures and low carbon measures towards the level of the 2 °C target in Asia

Overconfidence in climate overshoot

Erratum To: Implication of Paris Agreement in the Context of Long-Term Climate Mitigation Goals

A new scenario logic for the Paris Agreement long-term temperature goal

Achievability of the Paris targets in the EU—the role of demand-side-driven mitigation in different types of scenarios

Socioeconomic factors and future challenges of the goal of limiting the increase in global average temperature to 1.5 °C

Pathway comparison of limiting global warming to 2°C