Strategically Staying Small: Regulatory Avoidance and the CRA

Jacelly Cespedes,Jordan Nickerson,Carlos Parra
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3874987
2021-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:Using the introduction of an asset-based two-tiered evaluation scheme in the 1995 CRA reform, we examine the consequences of regulatory avoidance. Banks exploit the attribute-based regulation by strategically bunching below the $250M threshold. In a difference-in-differences design, we show that banks near the threshold prior to the reform reduce the growth of assets, particularly real estate and C&I loans. These banks also experience an increase in the rejection rate of loans in low-to-moderate-income (LMI) areas, targeted by the CRA, a decrease in lending that other banks do not fill. Regulatory avoidance also produces real effects. The areas with more exposure to these banks experience a decline in county-level small establishment shares and independent innovation. These results highlight a bank’s willingness to take costly actions to avoid regulatory oversight and subsequent credit reduction for individuals whom the CRA is designed to benefit.
English Else
What problem does this paper attempt to address?