Abstract:Significant differences in loan terms between demographically distinct groups of borrowers in the United States are often interpreted as evidence of systematic ethnic, racial or gender discrimination by lenders. The appearance and interpretation of such discrimination has long been a controversial issue in public policy and has significant implications for both the economic efficiency and equity of credit markets. Arising from concern for borrowers disadvantaged by such discrimination, the design and implementation of regulations preventing the disparate treatment of demographically distinct groups by lenders are generally considered to have enhanced the equality of access to credit. Unfortunately, existing research has not examined whether this gain in social equity comes at a cost in efficiency borne by all market participants. The reliance on adverse selection or moral hazard in current models of limited lending and credit rationing poses difficulties in empirical testing for the presence and magnitude of such costs. This paper offers a novel theoretical framework in which lending discrimination can endogenously arise in the presence of value-maximizing lenders competing in an economy with complete markets, common knowledge and arbitrage-free pricing. By avoiding the reliance of current models on the exogenous presence of adverse selection or moral hazard, this framework allows potential efficiency costs to beexamined in a market environment without an ex ante assumption of informational market failure. Owing to the presence of common knowledge among participants, we first show how equilibrium loan terms to borrowers in different demographic classes can diverge in such an efficient environment. We then apply the properties exhibited in market equilibria to measure the potential costs of misallocating credit risk owing to the type of regulations observed in actual credit markets.

Bank Supervision and Organizational Capital: The Case of Minority Lending

Bank Financing and Corporate Governance

Bank Supervision and Corporate Credit Supply

'Let Us Put Our Moneys Together:' Minority-Owned Banks and Resilience to Crises

Lender Automation and Racial Disparities in Credit Access

Banking for the Culture: Black-owned banks as cultural assets during the subprime lending boom

Bank Misconduct and Online Lending

The Effects of Regulatory Office Closures on Bank Behavior

Race, redlining, and residential mortgage loan performance

Loans and Lies: Does Bank Monitoring Reduce Corporate Misreporting?

Social Capital and Mortgage Delinquency

Credit Risk, Regulatory Costs and Lending Discrimination in Efficient Residential Mortgage Markets

Does Bank Monitoring Reduce Corporate Misreporting? Evidence from Foreign Bank Entry in China

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Mortgage Lending: New Evidence from Expanded HMDA Data

Credit Availability for Minority Business Owners in an Evolving Credit Environment

Lending Relationships Along Ownership Lines: Institutional Cross-Ownership and Bank Loan Contracts

Corporate ESG Profiles and Banking Relationships

Segregation and the Geography of Creditworthiness: Racial Inequality in a Recovered Mortgage Market

Uncovering the Source of Machine Bias

Credit Market Development and Corporate Earnings Management: Evidence from Banking and Branching Deregulations

Carrot or Stick? Evidence from a Pair of Randomized Field Experiments Testing Lender Information Sharing Hypotheses