Abstract:The knee joint plays a pivotal role in mobility and stability during ambulatory and standing activities of daily living (ADL). Increased incidence of knee joint pathologies and resulting surgeries has led to a growing need to understand the kinematics and kinetics of the knee. In vivo, in silico, and in vitro testing domains provide researchers different avenues to explore the effects of surgical interactions on the knee. Recent hardware and software advancements have increased the flexibility of in vitro testing, opening further opportunities to answer clinical questions. This paper describes best practices for conducting in vitro knee biomechanical testing by providing guidelines for future research. Prior to beginning an in vitro knee study, the clinical question must be identified by the research and clinical teams to determine if in vitro testing is necessary to answer the question and serve as the gold standard for problem resolution. After determining the clinical question, a series of questions ( What surgical or experimental conditions should be varied to answer the clinical question, what measurements are needed for each surgical or experimental condition, what loading conditions will generate the desired measurements, and do the loading conditions require muscle actuation? ) must be discussed to help dictate the type of hardware and software necessary to adequately answer the clinical question. Hardware (type of robot, load cell, actuators, fixtures, motion capture, ancillary sensors) and software (type of coordinate systems used for kinematics and kinetics, type of control) can then be acquired to create a testing system tailored to the desired testing conditions. Study design and verification steps should be decided upon prior to testing to maintain the accuracy of the collected data. Collected data should be reported with any supplementary metrics (RMS error, dynamic statistics) that help illuminate the reported results. An example study comparing two different anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques is provided to demonstrate the application of these guidelines. Adoption of these guidelines may allow for better interlaboratory result comparison to improve clinical outcomes. Received: 06 July 2023 Accepted: 08 March 2024 Accepted Manuscript online: 21 March 2024 Article published online: 24 April 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

Evaluation of a novel robotic testing method for stability and kinematics of total knee arthroplasty

Effect of surgical parameters on the biomechanical behaviour of bicondylar total knee endoprostheses – A robot-assisted test method based on a musculoskeletal model

DEIT-Based Bone Position and Orientation Estimation for Robotic Support in Total Knee Arthroplasty-A Computational Feasibility Study

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is more advantageous for knees with severe deformity: a randomized controlled trial study design.

A New Methodology for the Accurate Measurement of Tibiofemoral Kinematics in Human Cadaveric Knees: An Evaluation of the Anterior–Posterior Laxity Pre- and Post-Cruciate Ligament Resection

A novel computational workflow to holistically assess total knee arthroplasty biomechanics identifies subject-specific effects of joint mechanics on implant fixation

Determinants of pivot kinematics in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty

A SENSORIZED 3D-PRINTED KNEE TEST RIG FOR EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION OF PATELLAR TRACKING AND CONTACT SIMULATION AFTER TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT

Determination of optimal non-invasive patient fixation methods for use in robotic hip replacement surgery--an in vitro study

Methodology for Robotic In Vitro Testing of the Knee

Validation of a novel biomechanical test bench for the knee joint with six degrees of freedom

Total Knee Arthroplasty Kinematics Predict Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Implications for Clinical Kinematic Examinations

Robotic-arm assisted versus manual total knee arthroplasty: Functional gait analysis from a randomised controlled trial

Kinematics and kinetics comparison of ultra-congruent versus medial-pivot designs for total knee arthroplasty by multibody analysis

Does inverse kinematic alignment coupled with robot-assisted TKA optimize patellofemoral clinical and radiological results?

Performance of medial pivot, posterior stabilized and rotating platform total knee arthroplasty based on anteroposterior stability and patient-reported outcome measures; a multicentre double-blinded randomized controlled trial of 210 knees

Comparison of the Kinematics and Laxity of Total Knee Arthroplasty Bearing Designs Stabilized With Specimen-Specific Virtual Ligaments on a Joint Motion Simulator

Higher satisfaction and function scores in restricted kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment with medial pivot design total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomised controlled trial

The wear and kinematics of two medially stabilised total knee replacement systems

High three‐dimensional accuracy of component placement and lower limb alignment using a robotic arm‐assisted system and gap‐balancing instrument in total knee arthroplasty

Load-Dependent Characteristics of Cruciate-Retaining and Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Biomechanical Study