Rebuttal to a Paper on Wormholes

Leonard Susskind

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.gr-qc/0504039

2005-04-08

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

Abstract:In a recent paper on wormholes (gr-qc/0503097), the author of that paper demonstrated that he didn't know what he was talking about. In this paper I correct the author's naive erroneous misconceptions.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Comment On "Electromagnetic Radiation Under Explicit Symmetry Breaking" Reply

Dhiraj Sinha,Gehan A. J. Amaratunga

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.119701

IF: 8.6

2015-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract: Recently published paper [PRL 114, 147701 (2015)] contains several misleading statements and misinterpretations of known facts. The main massage of the paper [PRL 114, 147701 (2015)] is as follows: "We have shown that explicit symmetry breaking in the structural configuration of charges leads to symmetry breaking of the electric field which results in electromagnetic radiation due to non-conservative current within a localized region of space and time" seems to transcend mere empiricism, touching the theoretical foundations of electromagnetism. Moreover, basic mistakes are numerous in this article and its main claim is wrong. Below we prove it citing the paper and arguing against it.
Debating the Reliability and Robustness of the Learned Hamiltonian in the Traversable Wormhole Experiment

Galina Weinstein

2023-08-02

Abstract:The paper discusses Daniel Jafferis et al.'s "Nature" publication on "Traversable wormhole dynamics on a quantum processor." The experiment utilized Google's Sycamore quantum processor to simulate a sparse SYK model with a learned Hamiltonian. A debate ensued when Bryce Kobrin, Thomas Schuster, and Norman Yao raised concerns about the learned Hamiltonian's reliability, which Jafferis and the team addressed. Recently, there has been an update in the wormhole experiment saga. In an attempt to rescue the commuting Hamiltonian from its inevitable fate of being invalidated, a recent paper by Ping Gao proposed a creative solution to reinvigorate the concept within the context of teleportation through wormholes. This paper delves into the ongoing debate and the recent endeavor to address the comments made by Kobrin et al. I remain skeptical about the efforts to address Kobrin et al.'s challenges. By its nature, a commuting Hamiltonian does not exhibit chaotic behavior like non-commuting Hamiltonians. Moreover, it's always essential to assess the sensitivity of the Hamiltonian to noise to understand its practical feasibility for the real-world Sycamore processor.

Quantum Physics,History and Philosophy of Physics
Reply to the Comment "Past of a quantum particle and weak measurement"

Lev Vaidman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1310.1319

2013-10-04

Abstract:Misinterpretation in the preceding Comment of my recent analysis of the past of a photon is corrected. There is nothing in this analysis which is "contrary to the usual quantum expectations" but, nevertheless, it does provide "further understanding and interpretation of the system considered". In particular, it teaches us that the naive common sense argument frequently used in the literature including the Comment has to be abandoned.

Quantum Physics
Complementarity And Firewalls

Leonard Susskind

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1207.4090

2012-08-03

Abstract:This paper has been withdrawn because the author no longer believes the firewall argument is correct.

High Energy Physics - Theory,General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
Refutation of Richard Gill's Argument Against my Disproof of Bell's Theorem

Joy Christian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1203.2529

2020-02-18

Abstract:I identify a number of errors in Richard Gill's purported refutation (<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1203.1504" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1203.1504">arXiv:1203.1504</a>) of my disproof of Bell's theorem. In particular, I point out that his central argument is based, not only on a rather trivial misreading of my counterexample to Bell's theorem, but also on a simple oversight of a freedom of choice in the orientation of a Clifford algebra. What is innovative and original in my counterexample is thus mistaken for an error, at the expense of the professed universality and generality of Bell's theorem.

Quantum Physics
Reply to "Comment on 'Dr. Bertlmann's Socks in a Quaternionic World of Ambidextral Reality'"

Joy Christian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3076449

2021-05-24

Abstract:In this paper, I respond to a critique of one of my papers previously published in this journal, entitled `Dr. Bertlmann's socks in a quaternionic world of ambidextral reality.' The geometrical framework presented in my paper is based on a quaternionic 3-sphere, or S^3, taken as a model of the physical space in which we are inescapably confined to perform all our experiments. The framework intrinsically circumvents Bell's theorem by reproducing the singlet correlations local-realistically, without resorting to backward causation, superdeterminism, or any other conspiracy loophole. In this response, I demonstrate point by point that, contrary to its claims, the critique has not found any mistakes in my paper, either in the analytical model of the singlet correlations or in its event-by-event numerical simulation based on Geometric Algebra.

General Physics
Against ``Against Many-Worlds Interpretations''

Toshifumi Sakaguchi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.gr-qc/9704039

1997-04-15

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

Abstract:The paper entitled ``Against Many-Worlds Interpretations'' by A. Kent, which has recently been submitted to the e-Print archive (gr-qc/9703089) contained some misconceptions. The claims on Everett's many-worlds interpretation are quoted and answered.
Defect wormholes are defective

Joshua Baines,Rudeep Gaur,Matt Visser

2023-10-25

Abstract:The various "defect wormholes" developed by Klinkhamer have recently attracted considerable attention -- especially in view of the fact that the simplest example, the so-called "vacuum defect wormhole", was claimed to be an everywhere-vacuum everywhere-Ricci-flat exact solution to the Einstein equations. This claim has been conclusively refuted by Feng, and in the current article we take a deeper look at exactly what goes wrong. The central issue is this: Although Klinkhamer's specific representation of the metric $g_{ab}$ is smooth ($C^\infty$) his inverse metric $g^{ab}$ is not even everywhere continuous ($C^0$), being undefined at the wormhole throat. This situation implies that one should very carefully investigate curvature tensors at the throat using the Israel--Lanczos--Sen thin-shell formalism. Doing so reveals the presence of a delta-function energy-condition-violating thin shell of matter at the wormhole throat. The "defect wormholes" are thus revealed to be quite ordinary "cut-and-paste" thin-shell wormholes, but represented in a coordinate system which is unfortunately pathological at exactly the same place that all the interesting physics occurs. To help clarify the situation, we shall focus on the behaviour of suitable coordinate invariants -- the Ricci scalar, the eigenvalues of the mixed $R^a{}_b$ Ricci tensor, and the eigenvalues of the mixed $R^{ab}{}_{cd}$ Riemann tensor.

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
Comments on Unruh's Paper

Henry P. Stapp

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/9801056

1998-01-24

Abstract:Unruh has commented upon my recent proof that certain predictions of quantum theory are incompatible with the assertion that no influence of any kind acts backward in time in any Lorentz frame. Unruh fails to make a necessary distinction between statements that assert the existence of values, and statements that assert the existence merely of correlations between possible values. Consequently his argument fails to show that my proof involves a tacit or hidden reality assumption that is alien to quantum theory.

Quantum Physics
Remarks related to the paper of Rafael de la Madrid: "On the inconsistency of the Bohm-Gadella theory with quantum mechanics", JPhysA 39, No. 29, 9255-9268 (2006)

Hellmut Baumgaertel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0704.3529

2007-04-26

Abstract:The paper contains critical comments to the paper mentioned in the title from the mathematical point of view

Mathematical Physics
Refutation of C. W. Misner's claims in his article "Yilmaz Cancels Newton''

C. O. Alley,P. K. Aschan,H. Yilmaz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.gr-qc/9506082

1995-07-01

Abstract:It is shown that an article by C. W. Misner contains serious errors. In particular, the claim that the Yilmaz theory of gravitation cancels the Newtonian gravitational interaction is based on a false premise. With the correct premise the conclusion of the article regarding the absence of gravitational interactions applies to general relativity and not to the Yilmaz theory.

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
A Comment on "On Some Contradictory Computations in Multi-dimensional Mathematics"

E. Capelas de Oliveira,W. A. Rodrigues Jr

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math/0603599

2006-03-27

Abstract:In this paper we analyze the status of some `unbelievable results' presented in the paper `On Some Contradictory Computations in Multi-Dimensional Mathematics' [1] published in Nonlinear Analysis, a journal indexed in the Science Citation Index. Among some of the unbelievable results `proved' in the paper we can find statements like that: (i) a linear transformation which is a rotation in R^2 with rotation angle theta different from nphi/2, is inconsistent with arithmetic, (ii) complex number theory is inconsistent. Besides these 'results' of mathematical nature [1],offers also a `proof' that Special Relativity is inconsistent. Now, we are left with only two options (a) the results of [1] are correct and in this case we need a revolution in Mathematics (and also in Physics) or (b) the paper is a potpourri of nonsense. We show that option (b) is the correct one. All `proofs' appearing in [1] are trivially wrong, being based on a poor knowledge of advanced calculus notions. There are many examples (some of them discussed in [2,3,4,5,6]of complete wrong papers using nonsequitur Mathematics in the Physics literature. Taking into account also that a paper like [1] appeared in a Mathematics journal we think that it is time for editors and referees of scientific journals to become more careful in order to avoid the dissemination of nonsense.

General Mathematics
Reply to the comment "quant-ph/9710002"

Lu-Ming Duan,Guang-Can Guo

1997-01-01

Abstract:In the comment, Zanardi and Rasetti argue that several claims in our recent letter (Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1953, 1997) are questionable. The reply shows these claims remain true.
Comment on "On the Klein–Gordon oscillator in topologically charged Ellis–Bronnikov-type wormhole spacetime"

Paolo Amore,Francisco M. Fernández

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-024-05053-x

2024-03-16

The European Physical Journal Plus

Abstract:Our analysis of the results in a paper published recently in this journal shows that the authors failed to truncate the series that supposedly would yield the allowed energies of the bound states. Consequently, all the conclusions derived from their analytical expressions are incorrect.

physics, multidisciplinary
"On the Impossibility of a Poincare-Invariant Vacuum State with Unit Norm" Refuted

Stephen J. Summers

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0802.2935

2008-02-27

Abstract:Assertions made in a document recently deposited in the arXiv are refuted.

Mathematical Physics
Comment on "Electromagnetic Radiation under Explicit Symmetry Breaking"

C. Simovski,A. Miroshnichenko,P. Belov,A. Krasnok

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.119701

2015-08-07

Abstract:Recently published paper [PRL 114, 147701 (2015)] contains several misleading statements and misinterpretations of known facts. The main massage of the paper [PRL 114, 147701 (2015)] is as follows: "We have shown that explicit symmetry breaking in the structural configuration of charges leads to symmetry breaking of the electric field which results in electromagnetic radiation due to non-conservative current within a localized region of space and time" seems to transcend mere empiricism, touching the theoretical foundations of electromagnetism. Moreover, basic mistakes are numerous in this article and its main claim is wrong. Below we prove it citing the paper and arguing against it.

Optics
Comment on "Dr. Bertlmann's Socks in a Quaternionic World of Ambidextral Reality"

Richard D. Gill

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3060868

2022-05-27

Abstract:I point out critical errors in the paper "Dr. Bertlmann's Socks in a Quaternionic World of Ambidextral Reality" by Joy~Christian, published in IEEE Access. Christian's model does not generate the singlet correlations but in fact simply reproduces the Bertlmann effect. John Bell's friend and colleague Reinhold Bertlmann of CERN, in his younger days, always wore one pink and one blue sock, at random. The moment you saw his left foot, you knew what colour sock would be on his right foot. Action at a distance? As John Bell liked to explain, quantum entanglement cannot be explained away in such an easy way. Yet Christian's model assigns the two particles of the EPR-B experiment an equal and opposite spin at the source, the choice being determined by a fair coin toss. However they are measured, these spins are recovered. Christian's computer simulation works by not actually simulating his model at all but by almost directly tracing the negative cosine built into his computer algebra package. Bell's theorem has not been disproved. Debate as to what it means for the foundations of physics as well as for quantum information engineering (quantum communication, computation) is more lively today than ever before. Christian's paper, alas, does not contribute to the debate, but distracts from it. A possible role for Geometric Algebra is still wide open and deserves further investigation, informed by a proper understanding of the mathematical content of Bell's theorem.

General Physics,Quantum Physics
Small corrections to semiclassical gravity and their role in information paradoxes

Joydeep Chakravarty

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.09924

2021-05-21

Abstract:In this essay, we qualitatively demonstrate how small non-perturbative corrections are a necessary addition to semiclassical gravity's path integral. We use this to discuss implications for Hawking's information paradox and the bags of gold paradox.

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology,High Energy Physics - Theory
Comments on "Numerical study of the SWKB condition of novel classes of exactly solvable systems''

Jonathan Bougie,Asim Gangopadhyaya,Constantin Rasinariu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732323750020

2023-10-28

Abstract:We comment on the paper ``Numerical study of the SWKB condition of novel classes of exactly solvable systems'' [Y. Nasuda and N. Sawado, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 36, 2150025 (2021)]. We show that it misrepresents our prior work [J. Bougie, A. Gangopadhyaya and C. Rasinariu, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51, 375202 (2018)], and clarify this misunderstanding.

Mathematical Physics,High Energy Physics - Theory,Quantum Physics
Comment on "Evolution Equations of Nonlinearly Permissible, Coherent Hole Structures Propagating Persistently in Collisionless Plasmas''

I H Hutchinson

2023-08-02

Abstract:Recent critical remarks, published in "Annalen der Physik", about the present author's analysis of electron and ion holes and their stability are addressed and shown to be misunderstandings and misrepresentations.

Plasma Physics,Space Physics

Rebuttal to a Paper on Wormholes

Comment On "Electromagnetic Radiation Under Explicit Symmetry Breaking" Reply

Debating the Reliability and Robustness of the Learned Hamiltonian in the Traversable Wormhole Experiment

Reply to the Comment "Past of a quantum particle and weak measurement"

Complementarity And Firewalls

Refutation of Richard Gill's Argument Against my Disproof of Bell's Theorem

Reply to "Comment on 'Dr. Bertlmann's Socks in a Quaternionic World of Ambidextral Reality'"

Against ``Against Many-Worlds Interpretations''

Defect wormholes are defective

Comments on Unruh's Paper

Remarks related to the paper of Rafael de la Madrid: "On the inconsistency of the Bohm-Gadella theory with quantum mechanics", JPhysA 39, No. 29, 9255-9268 (2006)

Refutation of C. W. Misner's claims in his article "Yilmaz Cancels Newton''

A Comment on "On Some Contradictory Computations in Multi-dimensional Mathematics"

Reply to the comment "quant-ph/9710002"

Comment on "On the Klein–Gordon oscillator in topologically charged Ellis–Bronnikov-type wormhole spacetime"

"On the Impossibility of a Poincare-Invariant Vacuum State with Unit Norm" Refuted

Comment on "Electromagnetic Radiation under Explicit Symmetry Breaking"

Comment on "Dr. Bertlmann's Socks in a Quaternionic World of Ambidextral Reality"

Small corrections to semiclassical gravity and their role in information paradoxes

Comments on "Numerical study of the SWKB condition of novel classes of exactly solvable systems''

Comment on "Evolution Equations of Nonlinearly Permissible, Coherent Hole Structures Propagating Persistently in Collisionless Plasmas''