On the electron cloud instability in the csns ring
N. Wang,Q. Qin,Y. D. Liu,P. R. China
2010-01-01
Abstract:The electron proton (e-p) instability has been observed in many proton accelerators. It will induce transverse beam size blow up, cause beam loss and restrict the machine performance. A simulation code is developed to study the electron proton instability in the China Spallation Neutron Source (CSNS) ring. The results of numerical simulation of the electron cloud formation and the electron proton instability are presented. INTRODUCTION The electron proton instability has been considered as one of the potential threats in the proton rings [1, 2]. CSNS is a proton accelerator facility consists of a linac and a rapid cycling synchrotron (RCS) [3]. Two bunches with a population of 1.88 10 will be accumulated and accelerated in the RCS ring, and the electron cloud might influence the machine performance in such high intensity ring. A code [4] investigating the electron cloud instability in the positron rings is upgraded to study the electron proton instability in the proton rings. In this article, the electron cloud build up in the CSNS ring is discussed. Two variants of simulation of the electron cloud driven instability with and without energy spread are investigated. SIMULATION MODEL Three candidates of electron production are considered, which are lost protons hitting on the chamber wall, residual gas ionization, and secondary electron emission. The electrons contributed by residual gas ionization are generated along the beam trajectory. The electrons due to lost protons hitting the vacuum chamber wall are generated on the wall surface. The simplified model proposed by Furman is used to describe this kind of electrons, which represents the number of electrons generated by one proton bunch per turn as Np Y ploss, where Np is the bunch population, Y is the electron yield per lost proton, and ploss is the proton loss rate per turn per beam particle [5]. The lost protons are supposed to be proportional to the longitudinal bunch intensity in the simulation. By using the assumption of Y = 100 e /p/loss, we obtain an electron production rate of 1.33 10 2 per turn, which is 3 orders higher than that of the gas ionization. The secondary electrons consist of elastically back-scattered electrons, re-diffused electrons and truesecondary electrons. The model proposed in [6] is used to describe the secondary electron emission process. The vacuum chamber is considered as a perfectly conducting pipe with circular cross section. Both the electrons and the protons are represented by macro particles. The macro electrons are tracked dynamically in the transverse plane. As the bunches are about several tens of meters in length, they are longitudinally sliced with equal length. The bunch gaps are divided into intermediate steps to calculate the electron dynamics and secondary electron emission. The particles in different slices are rearranged after each bunch passage according to their longitudinal position. The space charge force is calculated at each slice in the bunch and each step in the gap by using the PIC method. In the simulation of the electron cloud driven instability, the electron cloud generation is considered simultaneously. The interaction of the proton bunch and the electron cloud is investigated in the transverse plane. The effect of the electron cloud act on the beam is represented by a transverse kick, and the electrons are treated fully dynamically otherwise. Table 2: Simulation Parameters for CSNS Parameters Symbol, unit Value Inj./Ext. Energy Ein/Eext, GeV 0.08/1.6 Circumference C, m 248 Bunch population Np, 10 9.4 Number of bunches nb 2