Abstract:The traditional purpose of a corporation is to pursue maximized profit,and a corporation is only responsible to its shareholders.As corporate operations begin to have widespread influences on the society,corporate social responsibility (CSR) is being increasingly stressed.It is believed that corporations should have two identities as a legal person.They are not only entities in private law,but also true members of the society.Since corporations benefit from the society, they should also contribute to the society,i.e.,to bear their social responsibility.As the social aspect of the law looms large,private law (including commercial law) gradually shifts from individualism to socialism and requires people to pay attention to social environment and care for social interests.Therefore,the socialization of private law constitutes the solid legal foundation of CSR. CSR is one type of obligations a corporation owes to the society.It refers largely to social obligations required by law,moral obligations as well as obligations occurring during operations that are neither explicitly required by law nor of a moral nature.This last type of obligations is a problem that the board of directors needs to solve when it makes and implements business strategies. It is also a problem that requires solutions in both theory and practice. The beneficiaries of CSR are largely the same as the non—shareholder stakeholders of corporations. As the stakeholder theory poses the issue of CSR as one aspect of corporate governance, it makes it possible to realize CSR.Boards of directors should make necessary arrangements on the social consequences of corporate activities when they make and implement their business strategies. They must have an accurate understanding of the extent of their obligations in this respect and perform such obligations seriously.Directors' duty of care shall include not only to meet the corporations' revenue targets,but also to adjust the relationship amongst the corporation,its shareholders and other stakeholders and maintain equilibrium amongst various interests.Directors should primarily work for the long—term interests of all shareholders.Furthermore,they should also ascertain and respect other stakeholders and establish a harmonious and mutually beneficial cooperative relationship.

Corporate Ethos and Justice as Fairness

Corporate Social Responsibility, Benefits beyond Legitimacy: A Symbiotic Framework

Corporate Social Responsibility: Its Influence on Corporate Law Theory

Reflections on "In the best interest of the corporation

Justice versus fairness in the family business workplace: A socioemotional wealth approach

Governance and Incentives: Is It Really All about the Money?

The interplay between ethics, justice, corporate social responsibility, and performance management sustainability

Warm Glow or Extra Charge? The Ambivalent Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility Activities on Customers’ Perceived Price Fairness

Corporate social responsibility and accountability: a new theoretical foundation for regulating CSR

In defense of a regulated market economy

Redefining Government Roles for a Fresh Perspective on Corporate Social Responsibility

Issues Concerning Rawls

Introduction to the Justice Theory of Rawls and Nozick --on the Changes Required to the Philosophical Approach

Communicative rationality and the evolution of business ethics: corporate social responsibility and stockowner–employee partnership–An empirical case study in Republic of Korea1

Investor personhood: the case against paternalism and welfarism in corporate law

The All-Stakeholders-Considered Case for Corporate Beneficence

On a Stakeholder Model of Corporate Governance

Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility in Profit- and in Non-Profit-Organizations

The Social Responsibility of Corporate Management: A Classical Critique

Enlightened Corporate Governance: Specific Investments by Employees as Legitimation for Residual Claims

Corporate Social Responsibility, Public Policy, and NGO Activism in Europe and the United States: An Institutional-Stakeholder Perspective