Abstract:China has made a great progress in economy and society since the beginning of the reform and opening up.In the market economy system,firms with profit maximization as their premier goal have become a powerful engine of the economy.However,the advancement of the society has not been in pace with the development of the economy.One of the main reasons is the negative externality of firms,such as pollution,when they are pursuing their own interests.Another reason is that information asymmetry between firms and society may lead to possible moral hazards,which can cause the supply of unsafe products and poor working conditions by the firms.These demonstrate that the conflict between firms and society is becoming more prominent.Besides,people's expectation for better human dignity and social justice is rising with their living standards.As a result,corporate social responsibility(CSR) becomes more serious and receives much more attention from both academics and practical business managers in China.The existing research and practice of Corporate Social Responsibility(CSR) are mainly from a unilateral view: from outside of the firm to inside of the firm or the firm itself by governments and society.This view suggests that firms will solve CSR problems under the pressure of governments and society.It does not work in China,however.On the one hand,governments and firms are in the same boat.Governments are reluctant to force firms to take CSR at the expense of their own interests.The accomplishment of government tasks,such as revenues,employment,economic growth,depend on the development of the firms.On the other hand, nongovernmental organizations(NGOs),which stand for the interests of various societal groups or organizations,are too underdeveloped in China to give enough pressure.Therefore,a multilateral interaction view should be adopted in stead of the unilateral view.The former believes that irresponsibility of firms is not a problem of the firms themselves,but of the whole society.The solution of the CSR problem depends on the interaction and cooperation of firms,governments,and NGOs.In fact,the relationships between firms,governments,and NGOs are not in balance in China for the time being.Governments and NGOs are quite active while firms are comparatively passive.The view of multilateral interaction can rectify the imbalance and effectively implement CSR.To shift from the unilateral view to multilateral interaction view,theoretical researches should highlight the motives,behaviors,and mechanisms of firms assuming CSR and introduce stakeholder theory.In practice,the shift can be promoted by the following course of actions:(1) re-examining the situations of firms in China and respecting the interests of them,and striving to put forward a multi-win plan;(2) emphasizing supporting policies to attract firms to assume CSR rather than solely exerting pressures on them;(3) improving the managers' CSR attitude through business training and education;(4) developing NGOs and encourage them to cooperate with governments and firms.

In defense of a regulated market economy

The New Political Role of Business in a Globalized World: A Review of a New Perspective on CSR and its Implications for the Firm, Governance, and Democracy

Democracy in Political Corporate Social Responsibility: A Dynamic, Multilevel Account

Who Fills the Global Governance Gap? Rethinking the Roles of Business and Government in Global Governance

Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility.

Corporate Social Responsibility: from a Unilateral View to a Multilateral Interaction View

Corporate Social Responsibility vs. Government Regulation: An Analysis of Institutional Choice

Corporate Social Responsibility and International Competition: A Welfare Analysis

Corporate regulation in the public interest– from concession to authorisation

Corporate social responsibility and accountability: a new theoretical foundation for regulating CSR

Corporate Ethos and Justice as Fairness

The Social Responsibility of Corporate Management: A Classical Critique

Political Science and the Study of Corporate Power: A Dissent from the New Conventional Wisdom

Corporate social responsibility in relation to the economic dimension of socio-economic policy

The Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility: Techniques of Neutralization, Stakeholder Management and Political CSR

Rhetorical Framing of Organizational Identity: Corporate Social Responsibility in the Modern World Polity

From the philosophy of corporate social responsibility to the market and political realities of ESG

Corporate Social Responsibility, Public Policy, and NGO Activism in Europe and the United States: An Institutional-Stakeholder Perspective

Corporate Social Responsibility: Its Influence on Corporate Law Theory

Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory

Formation and Development of Corporate Social Responsibility Concept