Abstract:Among the philosophical origins of John Rawls'A Theory of Justice,one figure has always been ignored-W.T.Stace,the doctoral supervisor of Rawls at Princeton.As an expert in mysticism,Hegelian philosophy and moral psychology,Stace is decisive in the formation of Rawls' philosophy.Richard Marius attributed Rawls'loss of faith partly to his intellectual engagement with Stace's essay Man Against Darkness.As Hegel was unwelcomed in western academic world at that time,Rawls'intentional concealing of his relationship with Stace is a manifestation of his attitude towards Hegel.Religion is perceived positively in Dewey's work and plays a pivotal role constructing democratic communities.In contrast,Rawls discards religious elements such as loyalty,universal fraternity and tolerance in designing the principles of justice,his ideal society is based on a wholly new foundation.Dewey advocates a gradually progressive way of reform,following the intellectual line of Locke-Hume-Smith.Education is employed as a main means.Whereas Rawls proposes a radically fundamental social transformation,following the line of Hobbes-Rousseau-Kant-Marx,These two ways may provide some far-reaching insight for China in its social and political reform at a critical turning point.In the process of Chinese social and political reform in the new century,it is of much significance to learn from these two scholars mentioned above while adhering to Marxism.Dewey's gradual approach to social reform might be of a great help in the social construction at grassroots level,whereas John Rawls'theory of justice is valuable in Chinese political reform.Finally,a well-ordered society with democracy,freedom,fairness and justice is what Chinese people really needs today.The major inspiration which can be drawn form these two political philosophers is : political and social reform should accord with the aspiration of people and human nature.

John Rawls, Godfather of Bioethics

The Complex of Theory of Rawls' Education Equity and the Criticism of Its Principle of Methodology

The Political Liberalism of Rawls and The Question of Justicial Ark in Pluralistic Times

Idealism in the Western Political-Ethical Philosophy

Issues Concerning Rawls

Rawls Vs. Nozick Vs. Kant on Domestic Economic Justice

Public Reason, Bioethics, and Public Policy: A Seductive Delusion or Ambitious Aspiration?

Economics with(out) ethics? An interdisciplinary encounter between public economists and John Rawls in the 1970s

The Ethics of Self-respect and Mutual Respect: From the Mutual Disinterest of Rawls

Corporate Ethos and Justice as Fairness

A Reflection on the Clash between A.Bloom and J.Rawls——On the Challenge of Strauss School to Modernity Scholarship

Fragmentary or Comprehensive:Comparative Study of Dewey's and Rawls' Social Governance Theories

The Moral Basis of Liberal Justice Theory

Nozick’s critique of Rawls: distribution, entitlement, and the assumptive world of A Theory of Justice

A Theory of Bioethics

How to Justify Principles of Justice

Maximin Justice, Sacrifice, and the Reciprocity Argument: A Pragmatic Reassessment of the Rawls/Nozick Debate

Reconstructing AI Ethics Principles: Rawlsian Ethics of Artificial Intelligence

Meaning and context in political theory

Autonomy and Paternalism in Health Policy: Currents in Contemporary Bioethics

Autonomy, Rationality, and Contemporary Bioethics