Meaningful Metrics for an Efficient Solvent-Free Formulation of Polymer – Argyrodite Hybrid Solid Electrolyte

Ronan Chometon,Marc Dechamps,Jean-Marie Tarascon,Christel Laberty-Robert
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1149/ma2023-026929mtgabs
2023-12-22
ECS Meeting Abstracts
Abstract:Solid-state batteries generate huge excitement with the promise of higher energy density than current Li-ion technology, thanks to the use of lithium metal at the anode 1 . Recent advancements in ceramic electrolytes demonstrate comparable conductivity with liquid ones 2 . However, the brittleness of ceramics results in mechanical limitations, during both assembly and cycling 3 , constraining the scale-up of pure-ceramic batteries. Hybrid solid electrolytes (HSE) can overcome this hurdle by combining the superior ionic conductivity of inorganic fillers with the scalable process of polymer electrolytes in a unique material. Depending on the amount of ceramic electrolyte, two types of HSE can be prepared: a ceramic-in-polymer approach, in which the inorganic filler disturbs the polymer crystallinity; and a polymer-in-ceramic system where the organic electrolyte mainly acts as a binder. Many parameters such as polymer molar mass, type and concentration of Li salt, chemistry and size of ceramic particles and the mixing route, make the HSE formulation an intricate process. As a result, there is a large disparity in the reported formulations and performances of HSE 4 . In particular, most approaches focus on a slurry-assisted preparation, which becomes a limiting factor when using sulfide-based electrolytes, as these ceramics degrade in common solvents used for binder processing 5 . To circumvent these issues, we propose a novel, solvent-free HSE preparation, combining an organic matrix based on poly(ethylene oxide) and lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (PEO:LiTFSI), with the highly conductive argyrodite-type Li 6 PS 5 Cl. The optimization of the HSE formulation is driven by key metrics, defined as sufficient ionic conductivity (σ ion ≥ 10 -4 S.cm -1 @25°C) and adequate mechanical characteristics (self-standing property and ability to process as thin membrane 100 cycles before reaching 20% capacity loss at C/5) but still suffers from higher polarization and thus lower capacity (130 vs 150 mAh.g -1 at C/20). Janek, J. et al., Nat Energy 1 , 16141 (2016). Abakumov, A. et al., Nat Commun 11 , 4976 (2020). Doux, J.-M. et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 8 , 5049–5055 (2020). Horowitz, Y. et al., J. Electrochem. Soc. 167 , 160514 (2020). Ruhl, J. et al., Adv. Ener. Sust. Res. 2 , 2000077 (2021).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?