A Corpus-Based Investigation of Definite Description Use

Massimo Poesio,Renata Vieira

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cmp-lg/9710007

1997-10-25

Abstract:We present the results of a study of definite descriptions use in written texts aimed at assessing the feasibility of annotating corpora with information about definite description interpretation. We ran two experiments, in which subjects were asked to classify the uses of definite descriptions in a corpus of 33 newspaper articles, containing a total of 1412 definite descriptions. We measured the agreement among annotators about the classes assigned to definite descriptions, as well as the agreement about the antecedent assigned to those definites that the annotators classified as being related to an antecedent in the text. The most interesting result of this study from a corpus annotation perspective was the rather low agreement (K=0.63) that we obtained using versions of Hawkins' and Prince's classification schemes; better results (K=0.76) were obtained using the simplified scheme proposed by Fraurud that includes only two classes, first-mention and subsequent-mention. The agreement about antecedents was also not complete. These findings raise questions concerning the strategy of evaluating systems for definite description interpretation by comparing their results with a standardized annotation. From a linguistic point of view, the most interesting observations were the great number of discourse-new definites in our corpus (in one of our experiments, about 50% of the definites in the collection were classified as discourse-new, 30% as anaphoric, and 18% as associative/bridging) and the presence of definites which did not seem to require a complete disambiguation.

Computation and Language

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problems that this paper attempts to solve mainly focus on two aspects:

1. **Statistically explaining the second law of thermodynamics**:
- Ludwig Boltzmann first proposed the statistical explanation of the second law of thermodynamics in 1877. He introduced probability theory to explain this fundamental physical law, breaking the prejudice in classical physics that fundamental laws must be strictly deterministic. Boltzmann's approach was strongly opposed by many physicists and mathematicians at that time, especially Josef Loschmidt's reversibility paradox and E. Zermelo's recurrence paradox. Nevertheless, Boltzmann responded to these objections through statistical arguments, and these efforts finally paved the way for the statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics proposed by Max Born in 1926.

2. **Introducing discrete energy levels**:
- Boltzmann first introduced the concept of discrete energy levels in his H - theorem paper in 1872. He introduced cells of finite size in phase space, and this method was fixed by Heisenberg's uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics. Boltzmann's method had an important influence on Max Planck's discovery of quantum mechanics in 1900. When studying black - body radiation, Planck adopted Boltzmann's statistical method and assumed that the energy absorbed and emitted by classical oscillators could only be an integer multiple of Planck's constant \( h \) and the radiation frequency \( \nu \), thus giving birth to quantum mechanics.

### Formula summary
- **Statistical expression of entropy**:
\[
S\propto\log\Omega
\]
where \( S \) is the entropy of the system and \( \Omega \) is the volume of the phase space occupied by the macroscopic state of the system. Using Planck's notation, this formula can be written as:
\[
S = k\log W
\]
where \( k \) is the Boltzmann constant and \( W \) is the number of microscopic states corresponding to the macroscopic state of the system.

- **Discrete energy levels**:
\[
E = nh\nu
\]
where \( E \) is the energy, \( n \) is an integer, \( h \) is Planck's constant, and \( \nu \) is the radiation frequency.

Through these innovations, Boltzmann not only laid the foundation for the development of statistical mechanics but also provided important theoretical support for the birth of quantum mechanics.