On Boltzmann's genius and thermodynamics

Elias P. Gyftopoulos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0710.2299

2007-10-12

Abstract:A recent essay [1] reminds us of how richly Boltzmann deserves to be admiringly commemorated for the originality of his ideas on the occasion of his 150th birthday. Without any doubt, the scientific community owes Boltzmann a great debt of gratitude for his ingenious and pathfinding contributions. However, the essay chooses to illustrate this important memorial by statements and inferences that perhaps are questionable today even to Boltzmann himself. I will comment only on three issues.

History and Philosophy of Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper attempts to solve the following main problems:

1. **The relationship between micro - and macro - behaviors**:
- The paper discusses Boltzmann's view on how micro - molecular behaviors can explain macro - phenomena. The author points out that the Boltzmann equation has a limited scope of application, only applicable when the number of molecules in each elementary volume in the phase space is less than 1. This means that the Boltzmann equation is more suitable for very dilute systems rather than macro - systems containing a large number of molecules. This observation is regarded as Boltzmann's foresight of quantum theory.

2. **The relationship between reversibility and the age of the universe**:
- The paper criticizes a common view that on an extremely long time scale (such as the age of the universe), abnormal events such as spontaneous gas separation can be observed. The author believes that this view ignores the reversibility defined in thermodynamics and the basic results of quantum theory. According to the thermodynamic definition, a process is reversible if and only if both the system and the environment can be restored to their initial states. And quantum theory shows that in the thermodynamic equilibrium state, the velocity of each molecule is zero, so the initial state cannot be restored through collisions or velocity reversals.

3. **Re - evaluation of Boltzmann's theory**:
- The paper presents some criticisms of Boltzmann's theory and suggests re - examining some new theoretical frameworks. The author emphasizes that although Boltzmann's contribution is huge, the development of modern physics requires us to examine his theory more in - depth. For example, the author proposes some new unified frameworks of thermodynamics and quantum theory, which do not rely on statistical probabilities but are based on strict quantum - mechanical principles.

4. **Challenges to existing theories**:
- The paper also discusses some challenges to existing theories, especially regarding the definition and calculation of entropy. The author proposes some new criteria for evaluating entropy expressions and proves that Boltzmann's entropy expression and some other common expressions do not meet these criteria. The author suggests using \( -k \text{Tr}(\rho \ln \rho) \) as the only acceptable expression for entropy, where \(\rho\) is the density operator.

In general, this paper aims to re - evaluate Boltzmann's theory and propose some new perspectives and methods to understand the basic concepts of thermodynamics and quantum mechanics.