0579 Electrode Configuration Effect on Usage and Self-Titration

Ruchir Patel,Max Lundeen,Israel Byrd,Kent Lee,Michael Coleman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae067.0579
IF: 6.313
2024-04-20
SLEEP
Abstract:Abstract Introduction Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) for obstructive sleep apnea uses an implanted pulse generator with a stimulation lead cuff wrapped around the hypoglossal nerve. The cuff includes three stimulation electrodes configured to +-+ by default but can be customized by a physician, for example to -+-, or a unipolar configuration using the generator as an electrode. Patients activate their therapy nightly with a button press on a short-range telemetry remote. With this remote, patients can titrate the therapy amplitude by increasing or decreasing 0.1V steps. Patients have reported that unipolar stimulation “feels” stronger per step than bipolar. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed the impact of default vs custom electrode configuration on nightly device usage and amplitude increase trajectory. Methods Device settings and usage pulled from the manufacturer’s cloud data system, SleepSync (Inspire Medical Systems Inc., Golden Valley MN), since 2018. 24322 patients with a full 90 days of usage data and without adjustments to their stimulation settings (pulse width 90μsec, pulse rate 33Hz) during the 90 days were selected and divided into cohorts based on initial programming to default vs custom electrode configuration (958 patients unipolar, 37 -+-). Usage was calculated as hours of daily therapy. Amplitude increase was calculated as the number of titrated steps up. Usage and amplitude increase were averaged per patient and reported as mean ± standard deviation, and T-tests were used for comparisons. Results In all patients, mean pre-implant AHI and ESS were 34.5±15.5 and 10.1±6.4, respectively. Mean BMI and Age were 28.9±3.5 and 62.4±12.2, respectively. Therapy usage with default polarity was higher than custom (6.21±1.67 hrs vs 5.63±1.92, 95% CI=[0.47,0.68]). Patients were able to increase amplitude with default polarity by more steps vs. custom (9.33±10.35 steps vs 6.65±10.61, 95% CI=[2.02,3.34]). Conclusion Both device usage and amplitude increase were higher in patients who retained the default electrode configuration vs patients who switched to a custom configuration, confirming hypothesis that the sensation of higher stimulation intensity is larger per step in unipolar configurations. Solutions to provide finer granularity of amplitude increases may improve usage in unipolar configurations. Support (if any) Employees of Inspire Medical Systems contributed to the data analysis.
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?