0459 Cardiovascular Endpoints for Obstructive Sleep Apnea with Twelfth Nerve Stimulation: Measures of Sleep-Related Function

Akshay Tangutur,Yi Cai,Brendan Keenan,Mathias Basner,Raj Dedhia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsad077.0459
IF: 6.313
2023-05-01
SLEEP
Abstract:Abstract Introduction Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an increasingly prevalent sleep-related breathing disorder linked to cognitive dysfunction and daytime sleepiness. Positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy, the first-line treatment for OSA, may improve cognitive function and sleepiness, but responses vary. Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) is a novel and effective PAP alternative, but its effect on mitigating cognitive decline secondary to OSA is unknown. In the first sham-controlled HGNS trial, we evaluated the effect of HGNS therapy on cognitive measures and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with moderate-severe OSA. Methods In a double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized crossover therapy trial, patients already stabilized on HGNS therapy underwent four weeks of active and four weeks of sham HGNS, each with a 1-week washout period. Sham therapy was defined as the lowest voltage at which HGNS was sensed by the patient or visualized by the clinician. Cognitive measures (Psychomotor Vigilance Test [PVT], Digit Symbol Substitution Task [DSST]) and sleep-related PROs (Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS], Snoring Visual Analog Scale [VAS], Insomnia Severity Index [ISI], Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire [FOSQ]) were assessed after each 4-week period and compared between active and sham therapy. Results Sixty randomized patients were included. On average, participants were elderly (67.3±9.9 years), overweight (BMI 28.7±4.6 kg/m2) and had severe OSA prior to HGNS therapy (AHI 33.1±14.9 events/hour). Patients’ AHI decreased to 23.0±15.6 events/hour with sham therapy (p=0.0001) and 18.1±14.8 events/hour with active therapy (p< 0.0001), with a 4.9 event/hour decrease between active and sham therapy (p=0.014). There were no significant differences in performance measures on PVT or DSST between active and sham HGNS. All sleep-related PROs were statistically significant with moderately large (effect sizes ~0.41-0.56) improvements following active HGNS. Conclusion The HGNS system permits a unique investigation of the therapy “on/off” effect on measures of cognitive function. In the first sham-controlled, randomized crossover trial of patients using HGNS, all sleep-related PROs, but not objective measures of cognition, were significantly different between sham and active (therapeutic) levels. These findings warrant additional investigation examining the relationship between subjective and objective measures of function in OSA. Support (if any) American Heart Association (17SDG33670349) American Sleep Medicine Foundation (176-JF-17) National Institutes of Health (P01-HL094307)
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?