0595 Tolerability and Activation Parameters Between Early vs Routine Activation of Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Therapy

Ruchir Patel,Anas Rihawi,Jordan Weiner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae067.0595

IF: 6.313

2024-04-20

SLEEP

Abstract:Abstract Introduction The current management protocol for HGNS is derived from the efficacy trials, but there is a lack of published data evaluating the tolerance and safety of earlier activation protocols. Thus, our goal is to compare the early and conventional activation parameters to identify differences. This will help us determine the potential benefits and risks associated with earlier activation and inform future protocols for HGNS management. Methods A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using data from a sleep specialty clinic of patients who received HGNS implantation for OSA. The patients were divided into two groups: early activation and standard activation. Data collected included age, time from implantation to activation, sensory threshold, and functional threshold. Statistical analysis involved the use of a non-parametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables to identify any significant differences between the two groups. Results A study was conducted on 58 patients, with 31 in the early activation group and 27 in the standard activation group. Among the early activation group,35% were female and 65% were male, while the standard activation group had 48% female and 52% male patients. Gender distribution was not significantly different between the two groups (P 0.425). The mean age was66 in the early activation group and 63 in the standard activation group, with no significant difference (P 0.67). The mean days until activation was significantly shorter in the early activation group (22.5 days, 95% CI 23.5-32.4) than in the standard activation group (45.1 days, 95% CI 32.3-47.9) (P0.00). The sensory threshold was significantly lower in the early activation group (mean 0.4, 95% CI 0.35-0.55) compared to the standard activation group (mean 0.7, 95% CI 0.59-0.88) (P 0.002). However, no significant difference in the functional threshold was observed, with mean values of 0.8(95% CI, 0.65-0.94) and 1.0 (95% CI, 0.85-1.27) for the early and standard activation groups, respectively (P 0.07). Conclusion Although patients who were activated early seem to have a lower sensory threshold, early activation did not appear to affect their functional threshold or activation standards. Support (if any)

neurosciences,clinical neurology