Abstract:Case studies have long been used to research and illuminate the lives of gifted students. One example is the longitudinal study of profoundly gifted students by the first author elaborating the impact of acceleration, non-acceleration, and ability grouping on gifted students academically, socially, and emotionally. In this chapter an overview of ability grouping and acceleration for academically gifted high school students in Australia in relation to their self-esteem will be reiterated. Specifically, a study will be discussed that examined the effects of three interventions: (1) ability grouping, (2) acceleration, and (3) acceleration used concurrently with ability grouping, on the self-esteem of academically gifted high school students. Self-esteem was assessed on three occasions during the school year with three groups of academically gifted Australian students undertaking their first year of secondary school (Year 7): (a) students in comprehensive schools (mixed-ability settings); (b) students in selective high schools (full-time ability grouping in schools serving only gifted students); and (c) students in selective high schools who were also collapsing Years 7 and 8 into a single year—a blend of ability grouping and acceleration. Students in the first two groups experienced a diminution (but not a serious drop) in self-esteem, probably associated with the drop-in status from being the most senior students in a (relatively) small primary school to being one of the youngest students in a school that could be several times larger. By contrast, students in the third group, which was not only experiencing the shift from primary to secondary school status but also telescoping the first two high school years into one, experienced only a modest dip in self-esteem. Their scores started off high and remained high. Some teachers in the schools employing the blend of acceleration and grouping expressed their concern that the use of two treatments rather than one might be ‘a bridge too far’. It does not seem to have been. Rather it seems to be an effective mode of blending two interventions whose effectiveness for supporting gifted students’ self-esteem is already acknowledged. Implications for research and practice that links with current research will be elaborated.

Gifted Today but Not Tomorrow? Longitudinal Changes in Ability and Achievement during Elementary School

Exceptionally Gifted Children: Long-Term Outcomes of Academic Acceleration and Nonacceleration

THE NATURE AND DEVELOPMENT OF GIFTEDNESS: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY

Ten-year longitudinal follow-up of ability-matched accelerated and unaccelerated gifted students.

What Longitudinal Research and Large-Scale Population Representative Studies Can Tell Us About Gifted Students and Education Policy 50 Years After the Marland Report

Academic acceleration in gifted youth and fruitless concerns regarding psychological well-being: A 35-year longitudinal study.

A Longitudinal Study of Academic Intrinsic Motivation in Intellectually Gifted Children: Childhood Through Early Adolescence

The Fullerton Longitudinal Study: A Long-Term Investigation of Intellectual and Motivational Giftedness

Why Hasn't the Gifted Label Caught up with Science?

Causal Attributions of Underachieving Gifted, Achieving Gifted, and Nongifted Students

On Being Gifted, but Sad and Misunderstood: Social, emotional, and academic outcomes of gifted students in the Wollongong Youth Study

Inequality at the Starting Line: Underrepresentation in Gifted Identification and Disparities in Early Achievement

Giftedness and Metacognition

SOME ASPECTS OF A STUDY OF THE GIFTED CHILD

Underachievement Among Spatially Gifted Students

Differences in Personal, Familial, Social, and School Factors Between Underachieving and Non-underachieving Gifted Secondary Students

Put Them Together and See How They Learn! Ability Grouping and Acceleration Effects on the Self-Esteem of Academically Gifted High School Students

Who Gets Identified? The Consequences of Variability in Teacher Ratings and Combination Rules for Determining Eligibility for Gifted Services for Young Children

Gifted, Streamed and Mixed-Ability Programs for Gifted Students: Impact on Self-Concept, Motivation, and Achievement

What Happens After Nomination? Evaluating the Probability of Gifted Identification With the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking