Causal Attributions of Underachieving Gifted, Achieving Gifted, and Nongifted Students

Kathy Seat Laffoon,Reva Jenkins-Friedman,Nona Tollefson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016235328901300102

1989-10-01

journal for the education of the gifted

Abstract:Underachievement among students with high intellectual potential is of increasing concern to educators and psychologists working with and/or studying this population. Although research has demonstrated a link between perceived control and motivation to achieve among elementary students, very little research has employed this variable in attempts to identify criterial characteristics of underachieving gifted children and youth. The study compared the mean locus of control and attribution scores of elementary students (75 males and 62 females) who were classified as underachieving gifted (21 males and 15 females), or nongifted (31 males, 31 females), or achieving gifted (23 males, 16 females). Results indicate that mean attribution scores for underachieving gifted students were significantly higher for ability in success situations than for achieving gifted or nongifted students. In contrast, underachieving gifted and nongifted students' mean scores were significantly higher for externality and luck in failure situations than their achieving gifted peers. Attribution retraining strategies, particularly those encouraging persistence and learning from failures, are recommended for underachieving-gifted students.