Validating an Evoked Potential Platform for Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation
Jordan J. Varghese,Matthew A. Shew,Amit Walia,Shannon M. Lefler,Nedim Durakovic,Cameron C. Wick,Amanda J. Ortmann,Jacques A. Herzog,Craig A. Buchman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31724
IF: 2.97
2024-08-30
The Laryngoscope
Abstract:Intraoperative electrocochleography (ECochG), an auditory evoked potential (AEP) of the cochlea, measured with a cochlear implant (CI) manufacturer research platform (Cochlear Corp [CC]), estimates postoperative CI speech perception scores. This intraoperative pilot study validated a dedicated AEP machine (Duet by Intelligent Hearing System [IHS]) through recording IHS‐ECochG responses that strongly correlated in magnitude (r = 0.905, 95% confidence interval: 0.809 to 0.954) with established CC‐ECochG responses. Future work will translate the IHS Duet system to the clinic for obtaining transtympanic ECochG as a preoperative parameter to estimate cochlear reserve and CI performance. Objective To validate electrocochleography (ECochG) between an auditory evoked potential (AEP) machine and an established cochlear implant (CI) manufacturer ECochG system. Methods Intraoperative validation study at a tertiary referral center. Patients included adults and children undergoing cochlear implantation. Intraoperative ECochG was measured with both the Intelligent Hearing Systems (IHS) Duet AEP machine and Cochlear Corporation (CC) ECochG platform. Recording electrodes captured extracochlear measurements through a standard facial recess. Tone‐bursts were presented from 250 Hz to 2 kHz (~110 dB SPL). A fast Fourier transform (FFT) of ECochG waveforms at key frequencies was summed into a total response (ECochG‐TR). Pearson's correlation was utilized to evaluate the relationship between IHS‐ECochG‐TR and CC‐ECochG‐TR after confirming normality. Results Thirty patients were enrolled with an average age of 67 years (SD 18.8). In the ear that was implanted, mean preoperative pure‐tone average (PTA; 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz) was 87.4 dB HL (SD 19.3) and mean preoperative word‐recognition scores (WRS) was 17.0% correct (SD 19.1). There was strong correlation (r = 0.905, 95% confidence interval: 0.809 to 0.954) between IHS‐ECochG‐TR (median 2.30 μV, range 0.1–148.26) and CC‐ECochG‐TR (median 3.00 μV, range 0.1–239.63). Four patients underwent transtympanic ECochG with the IHS system for feasibility evaluation and achieved similar responses. Conclusion Extracochlear ECochG has been predictive of CI speech perception performance. The IHS duet system is a valid measure of extracochlear ECochG for the CI population. Future work will utilize this system for measuring transtympanic ECochG to improve preoperative estimation of CI performance. Level of Evidence 3 Laryngoscope, 2024
medicine, research & experimental,otorhinolaryngology