Intrasubject Variability of Potential Early Markers of Sensorineural Hearing Damage

Nele De Poortere,Sarineh Keshishzadeh,Hannah Keppler,Ingeborg Dhooge,Sarah Verhulst
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.18.24301474
2024-06-05
Abstract:The quest for noninvasive early markers for sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) has yielded diverse measures of interest. However, comprehensive studies evaluating the test-retest reliability of multiple measures and stimuli within a single study are scarce, and a standardized clinical protocol for robust early markers of SNHL remains elusive. To address these gaps, this study explores the intra-subject variability of various potential EEG-biomarkers for cochlear synaptopathy (CS) and other SNHL-markers in the same individuals. Fifteen normal-hearing young adults underwent repeated measures of (extended high-frequency) pure-tone audiometry, speech-in-noise intelligibility, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), and auditory evoked potentials; comprising envelope following responses (EFR) and auditory brainstem responses (ABR). Results confirm high reliability in pure-tone audiometry, whereas the matrix sentence-test exhibited a significant learning effect. The reliability of DPOAEs varied across three evaluation methods, each employing distinct SNR-based criteria for DPOAE-datapoints. EFRs exhibited superior test-retest reliability compared to ABR-amplitudes. Our findings underscore the necessity for cautious interpretation of presumed noninvasive SNHL measures. While the robustness of tonal-audiometry was corroborated, we observed a confounding learning effect in longitudinal speech audiometry. The variability observed in DPOAEs highlights the importance of consistent ear probe replacement and meticulous measurement techniques, suggesting that DP-thresholds may be less suitable for clinical application. As potential EEG-biomarkers of CS, EFRs are preferred over ABR-amplitudes based on the current study results.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?