Electrochemical and biological characterization of thin-film platinum-iridium alloy electrode coatings: a chronic in vivo study
Ashley N Dalrymple,Mario Huynh,Bryony A Nayagam,Curtis D Lee,Greg R Weiland,Artin Petrossians,J John,III Whalen,James B Fallon,Robert K Shepherd,John J,Whalen III
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ab933d
IF: 5.043
2020-06-22
Journal of Neural Engineering
Abstract:<span><i>Objective.</i> To evaluate the electrochemical properties, biological response, and surface characterization of an electrodeposited Platinum-Iridium (Pt-Ir) electrode coating on cochlear implants subjected to chronic stimulation <i>in vivo. Approach</i>. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), charge storage capacity (CSC), charge injection limit (CIL), and voltage transient (VT) impedance were measured bench-top before and after implant and <i>in vivo</i>. Coated Pt-Ir and uncoated Pt electrode arrays were implanted into cochlea of normal hearing rats and stimulated for ~4 h d, 5 d week<sup>−1</sup> for 5 weeks at levels within the normal clinical range. Neural function was monitored using electrically-evoked auditory brainstem responses. After explant, the electrode surfaces were assessed, and cochleae examined histologically. <i>Main results</i>. When measured on bench-top before and after stimulation, Pt-Ir coated electrodes had significantly lower VT impedance (p < 0.001) and significantly higher CSC (p < 0.001) and CIL (p < 0.001) compared to uncoated Pt electrodes. <i>In vivo</i>, the CSC and CIL of Pt-Ir were significantly higher than Pt throughout the implantation period (<i>p</i>= 0.047 and <i>p</i>< 0.001, respectively); however, the VT impedance (<i>p</i>= 0.3) was not. There was no difference in foreign body response between material cohorts, although cochleae implanted with coated electrodes contained small deposits of Pt-Ir. There was no evidence of increased neural loss or loss of neural function in either group. Surface examination revealed no Pt corrosion on any electrodes. <i>Significance</i>. Electrodeposited Pt-Ir electrodes demonstrated significant improvements in electrochemical performance on the bench-top and <i>in vivo</i> compared to uncoated Pt. Neural function and tissue response to Pt-Ir electrodes were not different from uncoated Pt, despite small deposits of Pt-Ir in the tissue capsule. Electrodeposited Pt-Ir coatings offer promise as an improved electrode coating for active neural prostheses.</span>
engineering, biomedical,neurosciences