Electrochemical and biological characterization of thin-film platinum-iridium alloy electrode coatings: a chronic in vivo study

Ashley N Dalrymple,Mario Huynh,Bryony A Nayagam,Curtis D Lee,Greg R Weiland,Artin Petrossians,J John,III Whalen,James B Fallon,Robert K Shepherd,John J,Whalen III
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ab933d
IF: 5.043
2020-06-22
Journal of Neural Engineering
Abstract:<span><i>Objective.</i> To evaluate the electrochemical properties, biological response, and surface characterization of an electrodeposited Platinum-Iridium (Pt-Ir) electrode coating on cochlear implants subjected to chronic stimulation <i>in vivo. Approach</i>. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), charge storage capacity (CSC), charge injection limit (CIL), and voltage transient (VT) impedance were measured bench-top before and after implant and <i>in vivo</i>. Coated Pt-Ir and uncoated Pt electrode arrays were implanted into cochlea of normal hearing rats and stimulated for ~4 h d, 5 d week<sup>−1</sup> for 5 weeks at levels within the normal clinical range. Neural function was monitored using electrically-evoked auditory brainstem responses. After explant, the electrode surfaces were assessed, and cochleae examined histologically. <i>Main results</i>. When measured on bench-top before and after stimulation, Pt-Ir coated electrodes had significantly lower VT impedance (p &lt; 0.001) and significantly higher CSC (p &lt; 0.001) and CIL (p &lt; 0.001) compared to uncoated Pt electrodes. <i>In vivo</i>, the CSC and CIL of Pt-Ir were significantly higher than Pt throughout the implantation period (<i>p</i>= 0.047 and <i>p</i>&lt; 0.001, respectively); however, the VT impedance (<i>p</i>= 0.3) was not. There was no difference in foreign body response between material cohorts, although cochleae implanted with coated electrodes contained small deposits of Pt-Ir. There was no evidence of increased neural loss or loss of neural function in either group. Surface examination revealed no Pt corrosion on any electrodes. <i>Significance</i>. Electrodeposited Pt-Ir electrodes demonstrated significant improvements in electrochemical performance on the bench-top and <i>in vivo</i> compared to uncoated Pt. Neural function and tissue response to Pt-Ir electrodes were not different from uncoated Pt, despite small deposits of Pt-Ir in the tissue capsule. Electrodeposited Pt-Ir coatings offer promise as an improved electrode coating for active neural prostheses.</span>
engineering, biomedical,neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper aims to evaluate the electrochemical properties, biological responses and surface characteristics of platinum - iridium (Pt - Ir) electrode coatings under long - term in - vivo stimulation. Specifically, the researchers hope to solve the following key issues through this study: 1. **Electrochemical performance**: Compare the changes in electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), charge storage capacity (CSC), charge injection limit (CIL) and voltage transient (VT) impedance of Pt - Ir - coated electrodes and uncoated Pt electrodes before and after implantation. These parameters are crucial for understanding the stability and function of electrodes in vivo. 2. **Biological response**: Evaluate the tissue response of Pt - Ir - coated electrodes in vivo, including the foreign - body response and the situation of small deposits in the tissue capsule. In addition, the nerve function was also monitored, especially by electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) to assess nerve loss or loss of nerve function. 3. **Surface characteristics**: The electrode surfaces were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) before and after implantation to evaluate the integrity of the coating and the corrosion of Pt. ### Overview of research methods - **Experimental subjects**: Ten healthy adult Sprague Dawley rats were used for the experiment. - **Electrode array**: Cochlear electrode arrays with four Pt - ring electrodes were fabricated, and some of them were treated with Pt - Ir coating. - **Electrochemical measurement**: Measurements of EIS, CSC, CIL and VT impedance were carried out before and after implantation respectively. - **Surgical procedure**: The electrode arrays were implanted into the cochlea of rats, and the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) was recorded by subcutaneous needle electrodes. - **Chronic stimulation procedure**: Electrical stimulation was carried out in a tripolar or bipolar configuration for 4 to 6 hours a day, 5 days a week for 5 weeks. - **Histological analysis**: After the experiment, the cochlea was histologically stained and examined by SEM to evaluate the nerve survival rate and tissue response. ### Main results - **Electrochemical performance**: In vitro and in vivo, the VT impedance of Pt - Ir - coated electrodes was significantly lower than that of uncoated Pt electrodes, while the CSC and CIL were significantly higher than those of uncoated Pt electrodes. - **Biological response**: There was no significant difference in the foreign - body response between the two groups of materials, although there were a small number of Pt - Ir deposits in the cochlea of the Pt - Ir - coated electrode group. No evidence of nerve loss or loss of nerve function was observed. - **Surface characteristics**: SEM examination showed that there was no Pt corrosion on the surface of Pt - Ir - coated electrodes. ### Significance Pt - Ir - coated electrodes show significant advantages in electrochemical performance, and their biocompatibility and influence on nerve function in vivo are comparable to those of uncoated Pt electrodes. These results indicate that Pt - Ir coating is expected to become an improved electrode coating, which is suitable for active neural prostheses.