Abstract:Shadow libraries, also known as ''pirate libraries'', are online collections of copyrighted publications that have been made available for free without the permission of the copyright holders. They have gradually become key players of scientific knowledge dissemination, despite their illegality in most countries of the world. Many publishers and scientist-editors decry such libraries for their copyright infringement and loss of publication usage information, while some scholars and institutions support them, sometimes in a roundabout way, for their role in reducing inequalities of access to knowledge, particularly in low-income countries. Although there is a wealth of literature on shadow libraries, none of this have focused on its potential role in knowledge dissemination, through the open access movement. Here we analyze how shadow libraries can affect researchers' citation practices, highlighting some counter-intuitive findings about their impact on the Open Access Citation Advantage (OACA). Based on a large randomized sample, this study first shows that OA publications, including those in fully OA journals, receive more citations than their subscription-based counterparts do. However, the OACA has slightly decreased over the seven last years. The introduction of a distinction between those accessible or not via the Scihub platform among subscription-based suggest that the generalization of its use cancels the positive effect of OA publishing. The results show that publications in fully OA journals are victims of the success of Sci-hub. Thus, paradoxically, although Sci-hub may seem to facilitate access to scientific knowledge, it negatively affects the OA movement as a whole, by reducing the comparative advantage of OA publications in terms of visibility for researchers. The democratization of the use of Sci-hub may therefore lead to a vicious cycle, hindering efforts to develop full OA strategies without proposing a credible and sustainable alternative model for the dissemination of scientific knowledge.

Sci-Hub Project, its Legality, and its Impact on Access to Scientific Journals in Pakistan

Sci-Hub: What Librarians Should Know and Do about Article Piracy

Use and Perception of Sci-Hub by Library and Information Science (LIS) Professionals: From an Indian Perspective

Sci-Hub use among Spanish researchers: Enemy or a learning opportunity for libraries?

Access to full-text documents in libraries via Sci-Hub: a blessing in disguise to library users

Analysis of Sci-Hub downloads of computer science papers

On the culture of open access: the Sci-hub paradox

What do Indian Researchers download from Sci-Hub

Open Access Redefined: Survey Data and Literature Study on the Impact of Sci-Hub in Orthopaedic Research

Pirated Manuscripts From Radiology's Most Impactful Journals: An International Analysis of Copyright-Infringing Downloads

Black Open Access in Ukraine: Analysis of Downloading Sci-Hub Publications by Ukrainian Internet Users

Status of open access scholarly journal publishing in Pakistan

SCI-HUB AND LIBGEN: BURGLAR, PIRATE OR ROBINHOOD OF MEDICAL LITERATURE? A COMMENTARY

The Sci-Hub effect on papers’ citations

Which Nationals Use Sci-Hub Mostly?

Use, knowledge, and perception of the scientific contribution of Sci-Hub in medical students: Study in six countries in Latin America

A expressividade de uso da plataforma digital colaborativa Sci-Hub

Breach of academic values and misconduct: the case of Sci-Hub

Association between the use of Sci-Hub and consultation of scientific journals by medical students from six Latin American countries: A secondary analysis

Can scholarly pirate libraries bridge the knowledge access gap? An empirical study on the structural conditions of book piracy in global and European academia

An Investigation of Open Access Availability of Library and Information Science Research