Abstract:Background: The Internet is an invaluable tool for researchers and certainly also a source of inspiration. However, never before has it been so easy to plagiarise the work of others by clipping together (copy & paste) an apparently original paper or review paper from paragraphs on several websites. Moreover, the threshold of stealing ideas, whether lifting paragraphs or perhaps even whole articles from the Internet, seems to be much lower than copying sections from books or articles. In this article, we shall use the term cyberplagarism to describe the case where someone, intentionally or inadvertently, is taking information, phrases, or thoughts from the World Wide Web (WWW) and using it in a scholarly article without attributing the origin. Objectives: To illustrate a case of cyberplagiarism and to discuss potential Methods using the Internet to detect scientific misconduct. This report was also written to stimulate debate and thought among journal editors about the use of state of the art technology to fight cyberplagiarism. Methods: A case of a recent incident of cyberplagiarism, which occurred in the Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (JRCSEd), is reported. A systematic search of the Internet for informatics tools that help to identify plagiarism and duplicate publication was conducted. Results: This is the first in-depth report of an incident where significant portions of a web article were lifted into a scholarly article without attribution. In detecting and demonstrating this incident, a tool at www.plagiarism.org, has proven to be particularly useful. The plagiarism report generated by this tool stated that more than one third (36%) of the JRCSEd article consisted of phrases that were directly copied from multiple websites, without giving attribution to this fact. Conclusions: Cyberplagiarism may be a widespread and increasing problem. Plagiarism could be easily detected by journal editors and peer-reviewers if informatics tools would be applied. There is a striking gap between what is technically possible and what is in widespread use. As a consequence of the case described in this report, JMIR has taken the lead in applying information technology to prevent and fight plagiarism by routinely checking new submissions for evidence of cyberplagiarism.

Sci-Hub: What Librarians Should Know and Do about Article Piracy

Sci-Hub use among Spanish researchers: Enemy or a learning opportunity for libraries?

Sci-Hub Project, its Legality, and its Impact on Access to Scientific Journals in Pakistan

Use and Perception of Sci-Hub by Library and Information Science (LIS) Professionals: From an Indian Perspective

On the culture of open access: the Sci-hub paradox

Access to full-text documents in libraries via Sci-Hub: a blessing in disguise to library users

Analysis of Sci-Hub downloads of computer science papers

SCI-HUB AND LIBGEN: BURGLAR, PIRATE OR ROBINHOOD OF MEDICAL LITERATURE? A COMMENTARY

Open Access Redefined: Survey Data and Literature Study on the Impact of Sci-Hub in Orthopaedic Research

Which Nationals Use Sci-Hub Mostly?

Jumping over the paywall: Strategies and motivations for scholarly piracy and other alternatives

Pirated Manuscripts From Radiology's Most Impactful Journals: An International Analysis of Copyright-Infringing Downloads

The Sci-Hub effect on papers’ citations

What do Indian Researchers download from Sci-Hub

Breach of academic values and misconduct: the case of Sci-Hub

Black Open Access in Ukraine: Analysis of Downloading Sci-Hub Publications by Ukrainian Internet Users

The academic ethics of open access to research and scholarship

Sci‐Hub: The new and ultimate disruptor? View from the front

Use, knowledge, and perception of the scientific contribution of Sci-Hub in medical students: Study in six countries in Latin America

Report of a case of cyberplagiarism--and reflections on detecting and preventing academic misconduct using the Internet

Want a better h-index? - All you need to know about copyright and open access