What do Indian Researchers download from Sci-Hub

Vivek Kumar Singh,Satya Swarup Srichandan,Sujit Bhattacharya

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2103.16783

2021-03-31

Abstract:Recently three foreign academic publishers filed a case of copyright infringement against Sci-Hub and LibGen before the Delhi High Court and prayed for complete blocking these websites in India. In this context, this paper attempted to assess the impact that blocking of Sci-Hub may have on Indian research community. The download requests originating from India on a daily-basis are counted, geotagged and analysed by discipline, publisher, country and publication year etc. Results indicate that blocking Sci-Hub in India may actually hurt Indian research community in a significant way.

Digital Libraries

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper aims to explore the situation of Indian researchers downloading academic papers from Sci-Hub and assess the potential impact on the Indian research community if Sci-Hub is blocked. Specifically:

- **Background**: Recently, three foreign academic publishers (Elsevier, Wiley, and the American Chemical Society) filed a lawsuit in the Delhi High Court seeking a complete blockade of the Sci-Hub and LibGen websites. If this request is successful, these websites may face a situation similar to that in the United States in 2017.
- **Main Objectives**: To analyze how many academic papers Indian researchers have downloaded through Sci-Hub and the sources of these download requests.
- **Data Source**: The paper uses access logs from Sci-Hub in 2017 for analysis.
- **Findings**:
- Indian researchers downloaded over 13 million papers through Sci-Hub in 2017, averaging about 39,952 downloads per day.
- Download activities were spread across India, mainly concentrated in major cities such as New Delhi, Chennai, Bangalore, etc.
- Most of the downloaded papers were research results from the past 20 years.
- The main disciplines of the downloaded papers included Engineering (21%), Medical and Health Sciences (19%), Chemical Sciences (15%), and Information and Computing Sciences (11%).
- The main publishers included IEEE (22%), Springer Nature (14%), Elsevier (12%), and Wiley (12%).

Through this data analysis, the authors believe that blocking Sci-Hub would have a significant negative impact on India's research ecosystem, especially considering that many researchers rely on Sci-Hub to access academic resources. Additionally, blocking Sci-Hub could exacerbate the inequality of knowledge access across different regions of India. Therefore, the authors suggest taking more proactive measures, such as strengthening institutional repository mechanisms, to ensure that Indian researchers can access the country's research results for free.