Abstract:Shadow libraries, also known as ''pirate libraries'', are online collections of copyrighted publications that have been made available for free without the permission of the copyright holders. They have gradually become key players of scientific knowledge dissemination, despite their illegality in most countries of the world. Many publishers and scientist-editors decry such libraries for their copyright infringement and loss of publication usage information, while some scholars and institutions support them, sometimes in a roundabout way, for their role in reducing inequalities of access to knowledge, particularly in low-income countries. Although there is a wealth of literature on shadow libraries, none of this have focused on its potential role in knowledge dissemination, through the open access movement. Here we analyze how shadow libraries can affect researchers' citation practices, highlighting some counter-intuitive findings about their impact on the Open Access Citation Advantage (OACA). Based on a large randomized sample, this study first shows that OA publications, including those in fully OA journals, receive more citations than their subscription-based counterparts do. However, the OACA has slightly decreased over the seven last years. The introduction of a distinction between those accessible or not via the Scihub platform among subscription-based suggest that the generalization of its use cancels the positive effect of OA publishing. The results show that publications in fully OA journals are victims of the success of Sci-hub. Thus, paradoxically, although Sci-hub may seem to facilitate access to scientific knowledge, it negatively affects the OA movement as a whole, by reducing the comparative advantage of OA publications in terms of visibility for researchers. The democratization of the use of Sci-hub may therefore lead to a vicious cycle, hindering efforts to develop full OA strategies without proposing a credible and sustainable alternative model for the dissemination of scientific knowledge.

The Sci-Hub effect on papers’ citations

On the culture of open access: the Sci-hub paradox

Sci-Hub use among Spanish researchers: Enemy or a learning opportunity for libraries?

Analysis of Sci-Hub downloads of computer science papers

Relationship between downloads and citations at journal and paper levels, and the influence of language

On full text download and citation distributions in scientific-scholarly journals

Use of scientific journals in Spanish universities: analysis of the relationship between citations and downloads in two university library consortia

What do Indian Researchers download from Sci-Hub

Uncited articles and their effect on the concentration of citations

Does Open Access Really Increase Impact? A Large-Scale Randomized Analysis

Association between the use of Sci-Hub and consultation of scientific journals by medical students from six Latin American countries: A secondary analysis

Meta-analysis of the Correlation between Downloads and Citations at Paper Level

An analysis of the effects of sharing research data, code, and preprints on citations

The citation impact of social sciences and humanities upon patentable technology

Which Nationals Use Sci-Hub Mostly?

The Effect of “open Access” on Journal Impact Factors: A Causal Analysis of Medical Journals

Use and Perception of Sci-Hub by Library and Information Science (LIS) Professionals: From an Indian Perspective

Earlier Web Usage Statistics as Predictors of Later Citation Impact

Binary black-hole evolutions of excision and puncture data

Sci-Hub: What Librarians Should Know and Do about Article Piracy

On the Heterogeneous Distributions in Paper Citations