Abstract:Background After anterior resection (AR), one of the most debilitating complications is low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) seen in about 64% of patients. The severity of the LARS score was significantly correlated with neoadjuvant treatment, the extent of rectal surgery, complication by the anastomotic leak, female gender, and age < 64 years. In this study, we analyzed the impact of various clinical factors on LARS and also the various domains of quality of life (QoL). Purpose To assess the incidence of LARS in patients undergoing sphincter-sparing surgery for rectal cancer after the patient starts long-term defecating per anus, change in the QoL, and relation to LARS and factors affecting it. Methods One year before, 72 patients who had undergone AR in the Regional Cancer Centre were interviewed by a trained interviewer and data was collected from the file. The questionnaires used were the Wexner Incontinence score, LARS Malayalam Questionnaire, and European Organisation For Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ C30 Malayalam translations. Statistical measures The LARS score was used to categorize patients into three grades. The scores were compared with clinical and social factors using the χ2 test for association. Continuous variables were compared by the Spearman Rho test. Results Details of patients were studied (male: 55.6% (40) and female: 44.4% (32)). Fifty patients underwent low anterior resection (LAR). The mean LARS score was 25.61, with 47.2% of patients having severe LARS score. The mean Wexner score was 6.84. The relation with type of surgery, approach (laparoscopic vs open), or type of neoadjuvant therapy was not found to be significant. A higher LARS score did not impact overall QoL as assessed by FACT-C. Insomnia and diarrhea symptoms scores were significantly worsened. The pain score was worse for those undergoing stapler anastomosis. Wexner's score was worse for those who had received adjuvant chemotherapy. Role functioning score was better for AR compared to low anterior resection (LAR). Only distance from the anal verge was found to be a significant cause of LARS and was negatively correlated. Discussion LARS of severe degrees were seen in most patients. No modifiable risk factors were significantly found to affect the chance of LARS. However, LARS did not have a significant impact on QoL, neither did the type of surgery. So sphincter preservation can be offered to the patients, but all patients undergoing LAR should be counseled well about the risk of LARS before surgery.

Major low anterior resection syndrome has equivalent health-related quality of life implications as having a permanent colostomy

Comparison of Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Abdominoperineal Extirpation or Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer

Low Anterior Resection Syndrome and Quality of Life After Sphincter-Sparing Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Long-term Longitudinal Follow-up

Low Anterior Resection Syndrome and Quality of Life of Patients After Sphincter Preservation Surgery: A Prospective Study

Clinical application of artificial anal reconstruction after laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection in low rectal cancer patients]

Analyzing quality of life after low anterior resection for rectal cancer

Comparison of Anorectal Function and Quality of Life Measures in Patients Following Intersphincteric Resection and Lower Anterior Resection

Brazilian Patients Submitted to Abdominoperineal Resection and Definitive Abdominal Colostomy Have Low Quality of Life and Self-Esteem

Comparison of outcomes of abdominoperineal resection vs low anterior resection in very-low rectal cancer

Low anterior resection syndrome and quality of life after intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched study

Long-term Outcomes After Surgery Involving the Pelvic Floor in Rectal Cancer: Physical Activity, Quality of Life, and Health Status

[Comparative study of clinical efficacy between abdominoperineal resection and anterior resection procedure in patients with rectal cancer].

To what extent is the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) associated with quality of life as measured using the EORTC C30 and CR38 quality of life questionnaires?

Does the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score Accurately Represent the Impact of Bowel Dysfunction on Health-Related Quality of Life?

Quality of life and defecative function 10 years or longer after posterior sagittal anorectoplasty and laparoscopic-assisted anorectal pull-through for anorectal malformation

Two dominant patterns of low anterior resection syndrome and their effects on patients' quality of life

Quality of Life After Surgery for Rectal Cancer: a Comparison of Functional Outcomes After Transanal and Laparoscopic Approaches

Incidence of low anterior resection syndrome and its association with the quality of life in patients with lower rectal tumors

Impact of Defecation Dysfunction on Quality of Life in Mid-Low Rectal Cancer Patients Following Sphincter-Sparing Surgery

Prevalence of low anterior resection syndrome at a regional Australian centre

Quality of life after rectal cancer surgery (systematic review)