Abstract:Objective: To investigate functional outcomes and condition-specific quality-of-life (CSQoL) after intersphincteric resection (ISR) in patients with low rectal cancer using traditional and exploratory questionnaires. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in the Characteristic Medical Center of the People's Liberation Army Rocket Force. Totally 90 patients with low rectal cancer who underwent ISR with ileostomy reversal from May 2020 to April 2023 were enrolled. There were 64 males and 26 females, aged(58.6±10.4) years (range: 28 to 79 years). The median distance from the distal tumor margin to the anal verge(M(IQR)) was 3.0 (1.5) cm (range: 1.0 to 5.0 cm). An electronic self-assessment survey was sent to enrolled patients at 3 to 6, 12, and 24 to 36 months after reversal, and differences in functional and CSQoL results between the 3 groups were analyzed with generalized estimation equations. Functional outcomes were determined by the Wexner incontinence score (WIS) and the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score. In line with the five frequency responses ranging from never (score 0) to always (score 4) defined by the WIS, an exploratory survey was used to measure the severity of 16 LARS-specific variables confirmed by the latest international Delphi consensus. Furthermore, CSQoL was evaluated using the Fecal Incontinence Quality-of-life Scale (FIQL) and the visual analog scale (VAS). Results: There were 55 patients who completed the questionnaires at 3 to 6 months, 59 patients at 12 months, and 40 patients at 24 to 36 months of follow-up, respectively. The summary score of FIQL and VAS improved significantly after reversal (2.33±0.69 vs. 2.40±0.66 vs. 2.79±0.76, P=0.003; 5.31±1.65 vs. 5.61±1.9 vs. 6.58±1.92, P=0.002), but the differences in the WIS and LARS score did not reach statistical significance (both P>0.05). The survey responses for the LARS-specific variables indicated that "emptying difficulties" and "dissatisfaction with the bowels" were the most frequent symptom and consequence after ISR, respectively. The exploratory severity score for LARS improved significantly among the 3 time periods(34 (14) vs. 31 (13) vs. 23 (17), P=0.001). Furthermore, the FIQL summary score was strongly correlated with the LARS severity score (rs=-0.72, P<0.01), but weakly or moderately associated with the WIS and LARS score. Conclusions: Although a high prevalence of LARS may persist for years, patients reported an improvement in CSQoL and functional outcomes after ISR. The highest priorities recommended by the international consensus might provide better assessments the severity of LARS.

Low anterior resection syndrome and quality of life after intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched study

Transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis

Low Anterior Resection Syndrome and Quality of Life After Sphincter-Sparing Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Long-term Longitudinal Follow-up

The effect of robotic surgery on low anterior resection syndrome in patients with lower rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis

Transanal total mesorectal excision combined with intersphincteric resection has similar long-term oncological outcomes to laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection in low rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched cohort study

Oncologic safety and bowel function after ultralow anterior resection with or without intersphincteric resection for low lying rectal cancer: Comparative cross sectional study

Impact of Defecation Dysfunction on Quality of Life in Mid-Low Rectal Cancer Patients Following Sphincter-Sparing Surgery

A Controlled Study on the Efficacy and Quality of Life of Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection (ISR) and Extralevator Abdominoperineal Resection (ELAPE) in the Treatment of Extremely Low Rectal Cancer.

Low Anterior Resection Syndrome and Quality of Life of Patients After Sphincter Preservation Surgery: A Prospective Study

Comparison of Anal Function and Quality of Life after Conformal Sphincter Preservation Operation and Intersphincteric Resection of Very Low Rectal Cancer: a Multicenter, Retrospective, Case–control Analysis

Incidence of low anterior resection syndrome and its association with the quality of life in patients with lower rectal tumors

Comparison of Anorectal Function and Quality of Life Measures in Patients Following Intersphincteric Resection and Lower Anterior Resection

[A prospective observational study on functional outcomes and condition-specific quality of life after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer]

Analyzing quality of life after low anterior resection for rectal cancer

Clinical efficacy and prognostic analysis of intersphincteric resection in the sphincter-saving operation for ultra-low rectal cancer

Analysis of the correlation between defunctioning stoma and postoperative low anterior resection syndrome in rectal cancer: a prospective cohort study

Improvement of low anterior resection syndrome beyond 2 years after total mesorectal excision

Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection Versus an Open Approach for Low Rectal Cancer: a Meta-Analysis

Major low anterior resection syndrome has equivalent health-related quality of life implications as having a permanent colostomy

[Current Status of Research on Short-Term Quality of Life after Sphincteric-Saving Surgery in Rectal Cancer Patients].

Risk factors associated with low anterior resection syndrome: a cross-sectional study