Degradation of Lithium Iron Phosphate Sulfide Solid-State Batteries by Conductive Interfaces

Kerry Sun,Chuntian Cao,Dingyi Zhao,Xiao Tong,Seong-Min Bak,Yonghua Du,Feng Wang,Daniel A. Steingart

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c05039

2023-09-25

The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Abstract:The superionic solid-state argyrodite electrolyte Li6PS5Br can improve lithium and lithium-ion batteries’ safety and energy density. Despite many reports validating the conductivity of this electrolyte, it still suffers from passivating electrode degradation mechanisms. At first analysis, lithium iron phosphate (LFP) should be more thermodynamically stable in contact with sulfide electrolytes. However, without substantial improvements to interfacial engineering, we find that LFP is not inherently stable against Li6PS5Br. We hypothesize argyrodite oxidation favorably competes with LFP’s delithiation, insulating the electrolyte–electrode interface and causing large overpotential losses. We show that compared to LiNi x Mn y Co z O2, LFP has no actual electrochemical stability advantage despite operating at a lower voltage. We utilize tender energy XAS and XPS to show that chemical reactions occur between LFP and the Li6PS5Br solid electrolyte and these reactions are exacerbated by cycling. We also show that electrochemical degradation occurs at the interface between the solid electrolyte ion conductor and any electron conductor, namely, the active material and carbon additives. We further demonstrate that LiNbO3 cathode coatings on LFP can delay electrochemical degradation by electronically insulating the LFP–sulfide electrolyte interface but not prevent its occurrence at the carbon–electrolyte interface.

chemistry, physical,nanoscience & nanotechnology,materials science, multidisciplinary