Abstract:This article investigates the performance of finite element model updating to identify the induced damage in a two-story reinforced concrete masonry-infilled building using vibration data as well as lidar (light detection and ranging) scans. The building, located in El Centro, California, was severely damaged due to the 2010 El Mayor–Cucapah (Baja California, Mexico) Earthquake, and it was planned to be demolished following a number of ambient and forced vibration tests. The forced vibration tests were performed using an eccentric mass shaker. During the testing sequence, damage was induced to the building by removing four exterior walls. The modal parameters of the structure are estimated using the ambient vibration and forced vibration measurements at the reference state and damaged state. Lidar data are also used to detect surface defects and quantify the temporal changes of surface defects caused by the wall removal and forced vibration tests. Based on site inspections, geometry measurements, and material test data, two initial finite element models are built, namely the un-tuned initial model and the tuned initial model. The tuned initial model implements stiffness reduction factors to account for the observed damage in the building at its reference state while the un-tuned model does not. Two sets of reference models are calibrated to represent the structure at the reference state using the un-tuned and tuned initial models. The reference models are then updated to fit the measured data at the damaged state of the building with damage being estimated as the loss of stiffness in updating substructures. The estimated damage is compared to the nominal value of induced damage and surface defects detected by lidar scans. The analysis of the results indicates that the un-tuned and tuned initial models provide similar updated models and damage identification results which are in good agreement with the nominal values of damage and lidar detection results.

DAMAGE IDENTIFICATION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES BASED ON FINITE ELEMENT MODEL UPDATING

Model-informed Deep Learning Strategy with Vision Measurement for Damage Identification of Truss Structures

A Substructure-based Model Updating Method to Damage Detection for Large-scale Structures

Nonlinear finite element model updating with a decentralized approach

Structural damage identification via physics-guided machine learning: a methodology integrating pattern recognition with finite element model updating

Model Updating and Damage Detection Using Cross Model Cross Mode Method for 3D Frame Structures

An application of finite element model updating for damage assessment of a two-story reinforced concrete building and comparison with lidar

A Two-Stage Model Updating Method for the Linear Parts of Structures with Local Nonlinearities

Programmatic model updating of damaged structures using modified SERR method

Image-Based Hidden Damage Detection Method: Combining Stereo Digital Image Correlation and Finite Element Model Updating

Finite element model updating for structural damage detection using transmissibility data

Local damage identification method using finite element model updating based on a new wavelet damage function

Damage detection in retaining wall structures through a finite element model updating approach

Accurate FEM of Steel-Concrete Composite Box Girder Bridge for Damage Identification Based on Dynamical Experimental Study

Multi-Scale Analysis Of Damage Process For Concrete Structures

Damage Detection and Rehabilitation on A Curvilinear Steel Box Girder Bridge by Multistage Model Updating

Experimental validation of an efficient strategy for FE model updating and damage identification in tubular structures

Damage identification of single-layer cylindrical latticed shells based on the model updating technique

Structural modal identification and MCMC-based model updating by a Bayesian approach

MULTI-SCALE MODELING AND ANALYSES ON STRUCTURAL DETERIORATION AND DAMAGE IN LONG-SPAN BRIDGES AND ITS APPLICATION

Structural damage identification of offshore wind turbines: A two‐step strategy via FE model updating