Abstract:Purpose This study aims to address an acknowledged gap in the literature for the analysis of experienced practitioner views on the effects and implications of mandatory audit firm rotation (MAFR). Design/methodology/approach Using an exploratory and sequential design, data was collected from South African regulatory policy documents, organisational comment letters and semi-structured interviews of practitioners. These findings informed a field survey, administered to auditors, investors, chief financial officers (CFOs) and audit committee members of Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) listed companies. Findings Practitioners expressed considerable pushback against the potential efficacy of MAFR to improve audit quality due to various “switching costs”, notably the loss of client-specific knowledge and expertise upon rotation. In addition, the cost and disruption to both the client and audit firm are considered significant and unnecessary, compared to audit partner rotation. The audit industry may suffer reduced profitability and increased strain on partners, leading to a decline in the appeal of the profession as a career of choice. This is likely to have negative implications for audit industry diversity objectives. Furthermore, the industry may become more supplier-concentrated amongst the Big 4 firms. Practical implications The findings have policy implications for regulators deciding whether to adopt the regulation, as well as guiding the design of policies and procedures to mitigate the negative effects of adoption. Originality/value The participants are experienced with diverse roles concerning the use, preparation and audit of financial statements of large exchange-listed multinational companies, as well as engagement in the auditor appointment process. The extant literature presents mixed results on the link between MAFR and audit quality, with most studies relying on archival and experimental designs. These have a limited ability to identify and critique the potential’s witching costs and unintended consequences of the regulation. Experienced participants responsible for decision-making within the audit, audit oversight and auditor appointment process, are best suited to provide perspective on these effects, contrasted against the audit regulator’s position.

Audit partner attributes and key audit matters readability

It's a matter of style: The role of audit firms and audit partners in key audit matter reporting

Does Audit Partner Workload Compression Affect Audit Quality?

THE READABILITY OF KEY AUDIT MATTERS PARAGRAPH IN AUDITOR'S REPORT: A STUDY FROM ASEAN COUNTRIES

The Determinants and Impact of Key Audit Matters Disclosure in the Auditor’s Report

It is a balancing act: understanding the key audit matters disclosure in the context of a developing country

The impact of key audit matter characteristics on financial statement understandability and investor decision-making: An empirical stud

Key Audit Matters: ¿qué hemos logrado ya?

The effect of key audit matters on the audit report lag: evidence from Jordan

The Effect of KAMs Disclosure in the Extended Audit Report on Managerial Bad News Hoarding Behavior and Stock Price Crash Risk: The Role of Audit Firm Characteristics

What underlies key audit matters? Evidence from Taiwan

Content characteristics of key audit matters reported by auditors in Bangladesh and their implications for audit quality

The Effect of Disclosing Key Audit Matters and Accounting Standard Precision on the Audit Expectation Gap

Does Engagement Partners’ Effort Affect Audit Quality? With a Focus on the Effects of Internal Control System

Mandatory audit firm rotation: a critical composition of practitioner views from an emerging economy

A Preliminary Study on Auditors’ Performance Attributes – Perceptions from Accounting Firm Practitioners

The Economics of Audit Production: What Matters for Audit Quality? An Empirical Analysis of the Role of Midlevel Managers within the Audit Firm

Sustainable corporate governance and new auditing issues: a preliminary empirical evidence on key audit matters

Does the Reporting of Critical Audit Matters Affect Nonprofessional Investors’ Perceptions of Auditor Credibility, Information Overload, Audit Quality, and Investment Risk?

Measurement uncertainty and management bias in accounting estimates: the perspective of key audit matters reported by Chinese firms' auditors

Informational content of key audit matters and financial analysts’ forecasts