Abstract:Purpose This study examines whether auditors’ pricing decisions on managerial ability are affected by auditor litigation risk (financial distress or financial crisis), auditor’s familiarity with their client or regulatory changes in the post-Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) era. Design/methodology/approach Building on the extant audit fee literature, this study constructs an audit fee determinants model to examine how context affects auditors’ pricing of managerial ability. Findings Auditors offer a larger fee discount to more able client management teams when auditors face lower litigation risks or are more familiar with the client. Furthermore, managerial ability has a more pronounced effect on audit fees in the post-SOX era when managers are mandated to play more active roles in financial reporting (i.e. certification of financial statements required by SOX 302). Research limitations/implications Based on the audit risk model (Simunic, 1980), Krishnan and Wang (2015) show that the managerial ability of an audit client is relevant and important to auditors’ pricing decisions. This study demonstrates that managerial ability exhibits a non-linear relationship with audit fees and contextual factors, such as litigation risk, and that auditors’ familiarity with managers can alter the negative association between audit fees and managerial ability. This study extends Krishnan and Wang’s study by offering additional insights into auditors’ use of soft information such as managerial ability. Furthermore, the findings add to the literature on the impact of SOX on audit fees by suggesting that SOX has not only increased overall audit fees (Ghosh and Pawlewicz, 2009; Huang et al., 2009), it has also increased auditors’ price sensitivity to soft information (e.g. managerial ability). Practical implications This study provides insights for audit firms and client companies who are interested in understanding audit fee-pricing decisions. The findings also suggest that auditors need to be sensitive and responsive to various contextual factors when making pricing decisions. Originality/value Previous studies have not addressed the non-linear relationship between audit fees and soft information about managerial ability.

The Economics of Audit Production: What Matters for Audit Quality? An Empirical Analysis of the Role of Midlevel Managers within the Audit Firm

Does Audit Partner Workload Compression Affect Audit Quality?

The Effect of Auditing on Promoting Exports: Evidence from Private Firms in Emerging Markets

Abnormal Audit Fees and Audit Quality, The Impact of Business Context on Auditors' Priorities

An Examination of Factors Affecting Audit Practice Development

The effect of individual auditor quality on audit outcomes: opening the black box of audit quality

The Influence of Labor Market Power in the Audit Profession

Do Client Characteristics Really Drive the Big N Audit Quality Effect? New Evidence from Propensity Score Matching

Impact of Audit Quality on Earnings Management: An Empirical Analysis in the Indian Context

Employee Satisfaction and Work-Life Balance in Accounting Firms and Audit Quality

Audit Deficiency and Auditor Workload: Evidence from PCAOB Triennially Inspected Firms

Does Engagement Partners’ Effort Affect Audit Quality? With a Focus on the Effects of Internal Control System

Do audits serve as an external risk oversight tool to boost firm performance?

How Can Small International Accounting Firms Improve Audit Quality? The Role of Accounting Associations and Networks

The Impact of Audit Committee Strength on the Influence of Management Team Likeability

Anticipation of Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation and Audit Quality

The Contextual Nature of the Association Between Managerial Ability and Audit Fees

Auditor Skill Demands and Audit Quality: Evidence from Job Postings

Individual Auditor Style and Audit Quality in a High Reputation Risk Setting

Can High Audit Quality Constrain Real Earnings Management

Audit Quality and Earnings Manipulations in Nigeria: Beneish Model