Abstract:Background Standards for image quality evaluation in multi‐detector CT (MDCT) and cone‐beam CT (CBCT) are evolving to keep pace with technological advances. A clear need is emerging for methods that facilitate rigorous quality assurance (QA) with up‐to‐date metrology and streamlined workflow suitable to a range of MDCT and CBCT systems. Purpose To evaluate the feasibility and workflow associated with image quality (IQ) assessment in longitudinal studies for MDCT and CBCT with a single test phantom and semiautomated analysis of objective, quantitative IQ metrology. Methods A test phantom (CorgiTM Phantom, The Phantom Lab, Greenwich, New York, USA) was used in monthly IQ testing over the course of 1 year for three MDCT scanners (one of which presented helical and volumetric scan modes) and four CBCT scanners. Semiautomated software analyzed image uniformity, linearity, contrast, noise, contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR), 3D noise‐power spectrum (NPS), modulation transfer function (MTF) in axial and oblique directions, and cone‐beam artifact magnitude. The workflow was evaluated using methods adapted from systems/industrial engineering, including value stream process modeling (VSPM), standard work layout (SWL), and standard work control charts (SWCT) to quantify and optimize test methodology in routine practice. The completeness and consistency of DICOM data from each system was also evaluated. Results Quantitative IQ metrology provided valuable insight in longitudinal quality assurance (QA), with metrics such as NPS and MTF providing insight on root cause for various forms of system failure—for example, detector calibration and geometric calibration. Monthly constancy testing showed variations in IQ test metrics owing to system performance as well as phantom setup and provided initial estimates of upper and lower control limits appropriate to QA action levels. Rigorous evaluation of QA workflow identified methods to reduce total cycle time to ∼10 min for each system—viz., use of a single phantom configuration appropriate to all scanners and Head or Body scan protocols. Numerous gaps in the completeness and consistency of DICOM data were observed for CBCT systems. Conclusion An IQ phantom and test methodology was found to be suitable to QA of MDCT and CBCT systems with streamlined workflow appropriate to busy clinical settings.

Real-time automated quality control for quantitative MRI

Quality assessment and control of unprocessed anatomical, functional, and diffusion MRI of the human brain using MRIQC

Technical Note: MRQy - An open-source tool for quality control of MR imaging data

AutoMRISimQA: an automated system for daily quality control of a 3T MRI simulator

MRQy: An Open-Source Tool for Quality Control of MR Imaging Data

Scalable quality control on processing of large diffusion-weighted and structural magnetic resonance imaging datasets

Quantitative Parametric Mapping of Tissues Properties from Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging Enabled by Deep Learning

Objective image quality assurance in cone‐beam CT: Test methods, analysis, and workflow in longitudinal studies

FetMRQC: Automated Quality Control for fetal brain MRI

A comprehensive protocol for quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of the brain at 3 Tesla

Technical Report: Quality Assessment Tool for Machine Learning with Clinical CT

FetMRQC: a robust quality control system for multi-centric fetal brain MRI

Engineering AI Tools for Systematic and Scalable Quality Assessment in Magnetic Resonance Imaging

MRI data quality assessment for the RIN - Neuroimaging Network using the ACR phantoms

The Use of Quantitative Metrics and Machine Learning to Predict Radiologist Interpretations of MRI Image Quality and Artifacts

A scan-specific quality control acquisition for clinical whole-body (WB) MRI protocols

Solving the Pervasive Problem of Protocol Non-Compliance in MRI using an Open-Source tool mrQA

Quality control procedures and metrics for resting-state functional MRI

Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging phantoms: A review and the need for a system phantom

The IAEA remote and automated quality control methodology for radiography and mammography

Learning-Based Quality Control for Cardiac MR Images