Abstract:The monitoring and assessment of data quality is an essential step in the acquisition and analysis of functional MRI (fMRI) data. Ideally data quality monitoring is performed while the data are being acquired and the subject is still in the MRI scanner so that any errors can be caught early and addressed. It is also important to perform data quality assessments at multiple points in the processing pipeline. This is particularly true when analyzing datasets with large numbers of subjects, coming from multiple investigators and/or institutions. These quality control procedures should monitor not only the quality of the original and processed data, but also the accuracy and consistency of acquisition parameters. Between-site differences in acquisition parameters can guide the choice of certain processing steps (e.g., resampling from oblique orientations, spatial smoothing). Various quality control metrics can determine what subjects to exclude from the group analyses, and can also guide additional processing steps that may be necessary. This paper describes a combination of qualitative and quantitative assessments to determine the quality of fMRI data. Processing is performed using the AFNI data analysis package. Qualitative assessments include visual inspection of the structural T1-weighted and fMRI echo-planar images, functional connectivity maps, functional connectivity strength, and temporal signal-to-noise maps concatenated from all subjects into a movie format. Quantitative metrics include the acquisition parameters, statistics about the level of subject motion, temporal signal-to-noise ratio, smoothness of the data, and the average functional connectivity strength. These measures are evaluated at different steps in the processing pipeline to catch gross abnormalities in the data, and to determine deviations in acquisition parameters, the alignment to template space, the level of head motion, and other sources of noise. We also evaluate the effect of different quantitative QC cutoffs, specifically the motion censoring threshold, and the impact of bandpass filtering. These qualitative and quantitative metrics can then provide information about what subjects to exclude and what subjects to examine more closely in the analysis of large datasets.

MRI data quality assessment for the RIN - Neuroimaging Network using the ACR phantoms

Assessing data quality on fetal brain MRI reconstruction: a multi-site and multi-rater study

Quantifying 3D MR fingerprinting (3D‐MRF) reproducibility across subjects, sessions, and scanners automatically using MNI atlases

Quantifying the reproducibility and longitudinal repeatability of radiomics features in magnetic resonance Image-Guide accelerator Imaging: A phantom study

Quality assurance multicenter comparison of different MR scanners for quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging

Solving the Pervasive Problem of Protocol Non-Compliance in MRI using an Open-Source tool mrQA

Solving the Pervasive Problem of Protocol Non-Compliance in MRI using an Open-Source tool

Real-time automated quality control for quantitative MRI

Test–Retest Reproducibility of Reduced-Field-of-View Density-Weighted CRT MRSI at 3T

A multicenter study on radiomic features from T$_2$-weighted images of a customized MR pelvic phantom setting the basis for robust radiomic models in clinics

Technical Note: MRQy - An open-source tool for quality control of MR imaging data

Intensity warping for multisite MRI harmonization

Assessment of a novel commercial large field of view phantom for comprehensive MR imaging quality assurance of a 0.35T MRgRT system

Quality assessment and control of unprocessed anatomical, functional, and diffusion MRI of the human brain using MRIQC

Quantitative multi-parameter mapping of R1, PD, MT, and R2 at 3T: a multi-center validation

Quality assurance of quantitative cardiac T1-mapping in multicenter clinical trials – A T1 phantom program from the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy registry (HCMR) study

Repeat it without me: Crowdsourcing the T1 mapping common ground via the ISMRM reproducibility challenge

Quality control procedures and metrics for resting-state functional MRI

The Use of Quantitative Metrics and Machine Learning to Predict Radiologist Interpretations of MRI Image Quality and Artifacts

MRQy: An Open-Source Tool for Quality Control of MR Imaging Data

Open-access quantitative MRI data of the spinal cord and reproducibility across participants, sites and manufacturers