Abstract:Purpose Adaptive radiation therapy (ART) on the integrated Elekta Unity magnetic resonance (MR)‐linac requires routine quality assurance to verify delivery accuracy and system data transfer. In this work, our objective was to develop and validate a novel automated end‐to‐end test suite that verifies data transfer between multiple software platforms and quantifies the performance of multiple machine subcomponents critical to the ART process. Methods We designed and implemented a software tool to quantify the MR and megavoltage (MV) isocenter coincidence, treatment couch positioning consistency, isocenter shift accuracy for the adapted plan as well as the MLC and jaw position accuracy following the beam aperture adaptation. Our tool employs a reference treatment plan with a simulated isocenter shift generated on an MR image of a readily available phantom with MR and MV visible fiducials. Execution of the test occurs within the standard adapt‐to‐position (ATP) clinical workflow with MV images collected of the delivered treatment fields. Using descriptive statistics, we quantified uncertainty in couch positioning, isocentre shift as well as the jaw and MLC positions of the adapted fields. We also executed sensitivity measurements to evaluate the detection algorithm's performance. Results We report the results of 301 daily testing instances. We demonstrated consistent tracking of the MR‐to‐MV alignment with respect to the established value and to detect small changes on the order of 0.2 mm following machine service events. We found couch position consistency relative to the test baseline value was within 95% CI [–0.31, 0.26 mm]. For phantom shifts that form the basis for the plan adaptation, we found agreement between MV‐image‐detected phantom shift and online image registration, within ± 1.5 mm in all directions with a 95% CI difference of [–1.29, 0.79 mm]. For beam aperture adaptation accuracy, we found differences between the planned and detected jaw positions had a mean value of 0.27 mm and 95% CI of [–0.29, 0.82 mm] and –0.17 mm and 95% CI of [–0.37, 0.05 mm] for the MLC positions. Automated fiducial detected accuracy was within 0.08 ± 0.20 mm of manual localization. Introduced jaw and MLC position errors (1–10 mm) were detected within 0.55 mm (within 1 mm for 15/256 instances for the jaws). Phantom shifts (1.3 or 5 mm in each cardinal direction) from a reference position were detected within 0.26 mm. Conclusions We have demonstrated the accuracy and sensitivity of a daily end‐to‐end test suite capable of detecting errors in multiple machine subcomponents including system data transfer. Our test suite evaluates the entire treatment workflow and has captured system communication issues prior to patient treatment. With automated processing and the use of a standard vendor‐provided phantom, it is possible to expand to other Unity sites.

AutoMRISimQA: an automated system for daily quality control of a 3T MRI simulator

Real-time automated quality control for quantitative MRI

Commissioning and implementing a Quality Assurance program for dedicated radiation oncology MRI scanners

An open source automatic quality assurance (OSAQA) tool for the ACR MRI phantom

Technical Note: MRQy - An open-source tool for quality control of MR imaging data

Receive coil quality assurance procedure and automated analysis for ViewRay MRIdian MR‐Linac

MRQy: An Open-Source Tool for Quality Control of MR Imaging Data

MR‐linac daily semi‐automated end‐to‐end quality control verification

Assessment of a novel commercial large field of view phantom for comprehensive MR imaging quality assurance of a 0.35T MRgRT system

Objective image quality assurance in cone‐beam CT: Test methods, analysis, and workflow in longitudinal studies

Technical Note: Validation of an automatic ACR phantom quality assurance tool for an MR‐guided radiotherapy system

Solving the Pervasive Problem of Protocol Non-Compliance in MRI using an Open-Source tool mrQA

[Design and Implementation of an Automatic Analysis System for Magnetic Resonance Quality Detection Based on QT].

An automatical method for quality assurance of magnetic resonance imaging

The Use of Quantitative Metrics and Machine Learning to Predict Radiologist Interpretations of MRI Image Quality and Artifacts

MRIQA: Subjective Method and Objective Model for Magnetic Resonance Image Quality Assessment

Analysis of Routine Qa Testing for Conventional Simulators

Development and Longitudinal Analysis of Plan-Based Streamlined Quality Assurance on Multiple Positioning Guidance Systems With Single Phantom Setup

The IAEA remote and automated quality control methodology for radiography and mammography

Solving the Pervasive Problem of Protocol Non-Compliance in MRI using an Open-Source tool

Quality assurance and long‐term stability of a novel 3‐in‐1 X‐ray system for brachytherapy